Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Flame Photometry: Overview01:02

Flame Photometry: Overview

1.3K
Flame photometry, also known as flame emission spectrometry, is a technique used for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of elements present in a sample using a flame as the source of excitation energy. The concept of flame photometry was realized in the early 1860s by Kirchhoff and Bunsen, who discovered that specific elements emit characteristic radiation when excited in flames. The first instrument developed for this purpose was used to measure sodium (Na) in plant ash using a Bunsen...
1.3K
Flame Photometry: Lab01:16

Flame Photometry: Lab

775
In a flame photometer, when a solution like potassium chloride is aspirated into the flame, the solvent evaporates, leaving behind dehydrated salt. This salt dissociates into free gaseous atoms in their ground state. Some of these atoms absorb energy from the flame, leading to their excitation. The excited atoms return to the ground state, emitting photons at characteristic wavelengths. Because only electronic transitions are involved, the resulting emission lines are very narrow. The intensity...
775
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Atomization Methods01:25

Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Atomization Methods

1.3K
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS) atomizes samples through flame atomization or electrothermal atomization. Flame atomization typically involves a nebulizer and spray chamber assembly to combine the sample with a fuel–oxidant mixture, creating a fine aerosol mist that enters a burner. Typically, the fuel and oxidant are combined in an approximately stoichiometric ratio. However, for atoms that are easily oxidized, a fuel-rich mixture may be more advantageous. Only about 5% of the...
1.3K
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Interference01:30

Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Interference

551
In atomic emission spectroscopy (AES), high-temperature atomizers excite a broad range of elements and molecules that generate complex emissions from sources such as oxides, hydroxides, and flame combustion products in the flame or plasma. Several strategies can be employed to minimize spectral interferences caused by overlapping emission lines or bands. These include increasing instrument resolution, choosing alternative emission lines, optimally placing the detector in low-background regions,...
551
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

1.0K
In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...
1.0K
Atomic Fluorescence Spectroscopy01:29

Atomic Fluorescence Spectroscopy

855
Atomic fluorescence spectroscopy (AFS) is an analytical technique that involves the electronic transitions of atoms in a flame, furnace, or plasma being excited by electromagnetic (EM) radiation. When these atoms absorb energy, they become excited and subsequently release energy as they return to their original state. This emitted light, or "fluorescence," is observed at a right angle to the incident beam. Both absorption and emission processes transpire at distinct wavelengths, which...
855

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quantifying Gas Adsorption Variability and Optimal Si/Al Ratio for Rational Design of Aluminum-Substituted Zeolite Frameworks.

Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids·2025
Same author

Real-Time Model Predictive Control of Lignin Properties Using an Accelerated kMC Framework with Artificial Neural Networks.

Industrial & engineering chemistry research·2024
Same author

pH-responsive viscoelastic supramolecular viscosifiers based on dynamic complexation of zwitterionic octadecylamidopropyl betaine and triamine for hydraulic fracturing applications.

RSC advances·2022
Same author

Corrigendum to "Effects of particle size on the electrocoalescence dynamics and arrested morphology of liquid marbles" [J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 608(Part 1) (2022) 1094-1104].

Journal of colloid and interface science·2021
Same author

SOD2 V16A amplifies vascular dysfunction in sickle cell patients by curtailing mitochondria complex IV activity.

Blood·2021
Same author

Current development and perspectives of anaerobic bioconversion of crop stalks to Biogas: A review.

Bioresource technology·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Experimental Methodology for Estimation of Local Heat Fluxes and Burning Rates in Steady Laminar Boundary Layer Diffusion Flames
10:29

Experimental Methodology for Estimation of Local Heat Fluxes and Burning Rates in Steady Laminar Boundary Layer Diffusion Flames

Published on: June 1, 2016

12.3K

Liquid flammability ratings predicted by machine learning considering aerosolization.

Shuai Yuan1, Zhuoran Zhang1, Yue Sun1

  • 1Mary Kay O'Connor Process Safety Center, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, United States; Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, United States.

Journal of Hazardous Materials
|December 26, 2019
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces machine learning (ML) to assess liquid flammability, especially for aerosols. New methods improve safety by considering both flammability and aerosolization, crucial for preventing fires below standard flash points.

Keywords:
Aerosol flammabilityFlammability ratingLiquid flammabilityMachine learningRisk assessment

More Related Videos

Flame Experiments at the Advanced Light Source: New Insights into Soot Formation Processes
10:04

Flame Experiments at the Advanced Light Source: New Insights into Soot Formation Processes

Published on: May 26, 2014

13.2K
Generation of Electronic Cigarette Aerosol by a Third-Generation Machine-Vaping Device: Application to Toxicological Studies
08:39

Generation of Electronic Cigarette Aerosol by a Third-Generation Machine-Vaping Device: Application to Toxicological Studies

Published on: August 25, 2018

26.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Experimental Methodology for Estimation of Local Heat Fluxes and Burning Rates in Steady Laminar Boundary Layer Diffusion Flames
10:29

Experimental Methodology for Estimation of Local Heat Fluxes and Burning Rates in Steady Laminar Boundary Layer Diffusion Flames

Published on: June 1, 2016

12.3K
Flame Experiments at the Advanced Light Source: New Insights into Soot Formation Processes
10:04

Flame Experiments at the Advanced Light Source: New Insights into Soot Formation Processes

Published on: May 26, 2014

13.2K
Generation of Electronic Cigarette Aerosol by a Third-Generation Machine-Vaping Device: Application to Toxicological Studies
08:39

Generation of Electronic Cigarette Aerosol by a Third-Generation Machine-Vaping Device: Application to Toxicological Studies

Published on: August 25, 2018

26.3K

Area of Science:

  • Chemical safety engineering
  • Computational chemistry
  • Risk assessment

Background:

  • Traditional liquid flammability classification relies on flash points (NFPA 704, GHS, OSHA).
  • Flash points are inadequate for aerosolized liquids, posing significant fire risks.
  • Numerous incidents highlight ignition of liquids below their flash point in aerosol form.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop novel machine learning (ML) methods for assessing liquid flammability, incorporating aerosolization potential.
  • To propose a safety index combining flammability hazards and aerosolization probability.
  • To cluster liquids based on flammability and aerosolization using ML algorithms.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized two ML approaches on 823 compounds from the Design Institute for Physical Properties 801 database.
  • Method 1: Separate rating of flammability and aerosolization, combined via a safety index.
  • Method 2: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for dimensionality reduction and clustering (K-means and Hierarchical Clustering).

Main Results:

  • The first ML method effectively combines flammability and aerosolization data into a safety index.
  • PCA method automatically weights properties and facilitates clustering.
  • Hierarchical Clustering (HC) provided more reasonable aerosolization probability ratings, while K-means Clustering (KC) excelled in flammability clustering.

Conclusions:

  • ML offers a robust approach to evaluating liquid flammability beyond traditional flash point metrics.
  • Considering aerosolization is critical for accurate risk assessment of liquids.
  • The study demonstrates the utility of HC and KC algorithms for distinct aspects of liquid flammability assessment.