Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Vaginal birth vs caesarean section for extremely preterm vertex infants: a systematic review and meta-analyses
Alexander Jarde1, Yu Yang Feng2, Kristen Asia Viaje3
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada. a.jarde@gmail.com.
Purpose:
To synthesize evidence of mode of birth in extremely preterm vertex infants.
Methods:
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov (January 1995-July 2019). We included studies comparing outcomes by vaginal birth or caesarean section in vertex infants born < 28 weeks or with birthweight < 1500 g. Two reviewers independently performed all steps. Primary outcomes were death and/or severe brain injury. We synthesised the data using random-effects meta-analyses (PROSPERO CRD42017074145).
Results:
We included 14 studies with 129,475 infants. In vertex singletons < 28 weeks, caesarean section was associated with reduced adjusted odds of death (aOR 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39-0.99, 3 studies, 10,331 infants). For severe brain injury or a composite of death or severe brain injury, adjusted data were lacking. In infants with very low birth weight overall (< 1500 g) we found no significant benefit for our primary outcomes (e.g., death, aOR 0.77, 0.55-1.07, 2 studies, 105,439 infants), although there were some benefits associated with caesarean section in smaller weight subgroups (e.g., death aOR 500-700 g: 0.53, 0.49-0.57 [1 study, 5989 infants] and 1000-1250 g: 0.78, 0.65-0.93 [1 study, 14,906 infants]), but not larger weights (1250-1500 g: 1.38, 1.15-1.65 [1 study, 17,715 infants]).
Conclusion:
Caesarean section was associated with a significant decrease in the adjusted odds of death in extremely preterm vertex infants < 28 weeks. Smaller birth weight subgroups supported these results. The absence of randomized trials warrants judicious interpretation of these results, which are the currently available highest level of evidence. This study will inform further research.
