Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Factors Affecting Perception01:25

Factors Affecting Perception

2.5K
Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
2.5K
Perception01:28

Perception

916
Perception is a fundamental psychological process that enables individuals to organize, interpret, and consciously experience sensory information. This process is crucial for understanding and interacting with the world around us. It includes both bottom-up and top-down processing, each playing a distinct role in how we perceive our environment.
Bottom-up processing begins at the sensory level, where receptors detect external environmental stimuli. These could include the tactile sensation of...
916
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.8K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.8K
Subliminal Perception01:15

Subliminal Perception

657
Subliminal perception refers to the processing of sensory information that occurs below the level of conscious awareness. Researchers study subliminal perception by presenting a stimulus, such as a word or image, very quickly, typically around 50 milliseconds. This rapid presentation is often followed by another stimulus, such as a pattern of dots or lines, which blocks further mental processing of the initial stimulus. As a result, if participants cannot identify the initial stimulus better...
657
First Impression01:09

First Impression

150
First impressions play a crucial role in social perception, shaping how individuals assess others in professional, academic, and interpersonal contexts. Psychological research highlights the significance of cognitive biases, such as the primacy and recency effects, which influence how people interpret and recall information.The Primacy Effect and Cognitive AnchoringThe primacy effect describes the tendency for initial information to impact judgment disproportionately. When individuals encounter...
150
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

183
Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
183

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contextual Modulation of Primary Visual Cortex by Temporal Predictability During Motion Extrapolation.

Brain and behavior·2025
Same author

New Records of <i>Phenacoccus solenopsis</i> Natural Enemies in Europe and Taxonomic Additions on <i>Anagyrus matritensis</i>.

Insects·2025
Same author

Sublethal effects of nine insecticides on Drosophila suzukii and its major pupal parasitoid Trichopria drosophilae.

Pest management science·2023
Same author

The Potential Role of Gustatory Function as an Early Diagnostic Marker for the Risk of Alzheimer's Disease in Subjective Cognitive Decline.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports·2023
Same author

Entering into a self-regulated learning mode prevents detrimental effects of feedback removal on memory.

NPJ science of learning·2023
Same author

Corrigendum: You were better than expected-An experimental study to examine expectation change in a non-clinical sample.

Frontiers in psychology·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.7K

Explicitly versus implicitly driven temporal expectations: No evidence for altered perceptual processing due to

Felix Ball1,2, Rosa-Marie Groth3, Camila S Agostino3,4

  • 1Biological Psychology, Faculty of Natural Science, Otto-von-Guericke-University, PO Box 4120, 39106, Magdeburg, Germany. Felix.Ball@ovgu.de.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|December 26, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Explicit knowledge about temporal regularities did not enhance temporal expectations in a letter-discrimination task. Computational modeling suggests explicit knowledge may influence response strategies rather than perceptual processing.

Keywords:
Computational modelsExplicit vs. implicit learningMetacognitionTemporal expectations

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.2K
The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

7.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.7K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.2K
The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

7.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Statistical learning of environmental regularities enhances performance.
  • The impact of explicit knowledge on implicit statistical learning, particularly temporal regularities, is not fully understood.
  • Previous research suggested explicit temporal knowledge could enhance temporal expectations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To replicate and extend findings on explicit knowledge modulating temporal expectations.
  • To investigate the mechanistic basis of these effects using computational modeling.
  • To determine if explicit metacognitive knowledge influences perceptual or response-level processes.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a letter-discrimination task with varying temporal predictability (short/long delays) and cue validity (implicit, explicit, highly explicit).
  • Behavioral data were analyzed using Bayesian statistics.
  • Computational modeling was employed to explore underlying mechanisms.

Main Results:

  • Replication of effects for target-flanker congruence and sound presence.
  • No evidence found for explicit knowledge enhancing temporal expectations.
  • Computational modeling indicated explicit knowledge might affect response criteria, not sensory processing.

Conclusions:

  • Explicit metacognitive knowledge about temporal regularities does not appear to alter sensory representations or temporal expectations.
  • Findings suggest explicit knowledge primarily influences response strategies and non-perceptual processing.
  • This challenges the notion that explicit knowledge directly enhances implicit statistical learning of temporal sequences.