Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Development of Compendium for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Published on: April 12, 2024
The ESC 2019 CCS guidelines: Have we left our patients and scientific evidence behind?
A J Manolis1, M S Kallistratos1, L Ε Poulimenos1
1Cardiology Department, Asklepeion General Hospital, 1 Vasileos pavou Ave, Voula, Athens 16673, Greece.
Insights
Current guidelines for managing anginal symptoms lack specific pharmacotherapy advice. This review clarifies disagreements in treatment strategies for better patient care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) 2019 guidelines acknowledge the need for individualized anginal symptom management.
- However, these guidelines offer limited specific guidance on utilizing pharmacotherapy effectively to achieve treatment goals.
Purpose of the Study:
- To summarize and discuss key points of disagreement regarding pharmacotherapy in the management of anginal symptoms.
- To provide clarity and actionable insights beyond current guideline recommendations.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of existing guidelines and relevant studies.
- Critical analysis and synthesis of differing viewpoints on anti-anginal pharmacotherapy.
Main Results:
- Identification of specific areas where current guidelines lack clarity on pharmacotherapy.
- Discussion of alternative or debated approaches to drug selection and titration for angina.
Conclusions:
- There is a need for more detailed recommendations on pharmacotherapy for anginal symptom control.
- Further research and expert consensus are required to refine treatment strategies and improve patient outcomes.
Abstract:
The ESC CCS 2019 guidelines recognize that successful management of anginal symptoms relies on effective therapy tailored to individual patient characteristics but do not provide any specific advice or clarity on how to utilize pharmacotherapy in order to achieve these goals. In this review, we are going to summarize and discuss the main points of disagreement.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
14:24Percutaneous Contrast Echocardiography-guided Intramyocardial Injection and Cell Delivery in a Large Preclinical Model
Published on: January 21, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Standards of Care II
Standards of Care I
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare: