Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Treatment of Platelet Products with Riboflavin and UV Light: Effectiveness Against High Titer Bacterial Contamination
Published on: August 24, 2015
Long-term Experience with Rapid Screening for Platelet Bacterial Contamination in a High-volume Transfusion Service
Reem Alrabeh1,2, Laura Korte1, Meredith Reyes1
1Department of Cardiology, CHI St. Luke's Health - Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Abstract:
Bacterial sepsis after platelet transfusion is a major cause of transfusion-transmitted infections in the US. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends performing quality control for platelet bacterial detection on days 4 and 5 before platelet transfusion. We assessed the feasibility of implementing the Pan Genera Detection (PGD) test, an FDA-approved immunoassay for platelet bacterial detection, for the primary and secondary bacterial screening of platelet units in a high-volume setting. Records were reviewed from January 2010 through December 2015. All apheresis platelets underwent primary screening by using culture methods. Additional screening with the PGD test was performed daily until February 2013, when PGD testing of apheresis platelets was performed at the start of storage day 5. In April 2015, PGD testing of apheresis platelet products was performed at the start of storage day 4. Post-storage pooled whole blood-derived platelets were screened by using the PGD test on the day of use. During the 6-year study period, 16,839 PGD tests were performed. If the PGD test was reactive, repeat PGD testing was performed. In cases of repeat reactivity, units were quarantined and cultured. Initially, 42 (0.25%) tests were reactive; 26/42 (61.91%) were repeatedly reactive and resulted in an overall PGD repeat reactivity rate of 0.15%. Only one sample grew coagulase-negative Staphylococcus No transfusion-transmitted infections were reported. The PGD bacterial detection assay was feasible and efficient in our high-volume transfusion service.

