Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Group Polarization01:01

Group Polarization

38.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
38.3K
Social Foundations of Self IV: Self in Digital Communication01:30

Social Foundations of Self IV: Self in Digital Communication

141
Since the early 2000s, computer-mediated communication (CMC) has grown rapidly, playing a crucial role in self-development. A key distinction between CMC and real-life interactions is the lack of a physically present partner. This absence makes non-verbal cues such as facial expressions, body language, and paralinguistic signals unavailable in CMC platforms like email, instant messaging, or social media. The lack of these cues can create ambiguity and complicate how feedback is interpreted.The...
141
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

42.8K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
42.8K
Nonconscious Mimicry01:13

Nonconscious Mimicry

5.0K
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
5.0K
Echo01:06

Echo

835
The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...
835
Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

149
Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the...
149

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Feline heartworm disease in endemic settings: an integrated diagnostic approach.

Research in veterinary science·2026
Same author

Further evaluations on the use of body condition score as target selective treatment criterion to control subclinical gastrointestinal nematode infections on dairy sheep.

Research in veterinary science·2026
Same author

Entomological survey of Dirofilaria spp. in Sardinia (Italy): molecular detection and mosquito species distribution.

Parasites & vectors·2026
Same author

Neurotropic parasites of small companion animals: an overlooked neurological concern.

Parasitology·2026
Same author

Decoding the evolution of melodic and harmonic structure of Western music through the lens of network science.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

How AI and Human Judgment Differ: Putting humans and large language models head-to-head in tests of reasoning underscores the differences between them.

Scientific American·2026
Same journal

Turbulent flow in a vortex separator with a directed pipe inlet.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Systematic characteristic evaluation of clay-based cementitious material derived from calcium carbide residue and waste tile powder.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Retraction Note: Improvement of a rapid diagnostic application of monoclonal antibodies against avian influenza H7 subtype virus using Europium nanoparticles.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Applying large language models to spam detection in the Kazakh low-resource language setting.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

An open-source 3D printing system enabling in-situ freeze-thaw processing of hydrogels.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

An enhanced EfficientNet framework for automated waste classification using cosine annealing and label smoothing.

Scientific reports·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 1, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.7K

Recursive patterns in online echo chambers.

Emanuele Brugnoli1, Matteo Cinelli2, Walter Quattrociocchi3

  • 1Applico Lab, CNR-ISC, Rome, 00185, Italy. emanuele.brugnoli@roma1.infn.it.

Scientific Reports
|December 29, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Social media users form polarized groups, creating echo chambers. Confirmation bias, driven by challenge avoidance and reinforcement seeking, strengthens these beliefs through peer influence and selective information sharing.

More Related Videos

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
08:53

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Published on: May 31, 2019

5.5K
Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

20.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 1, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.7K
Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
08:53

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Published on: May 31, 2019

5.5K
Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

20.4K

Area of Science:

  • Social Media Analysis
  • Network Science
  • Information Diffusion

Background:

  • Social media platforms influence information consumption, opinion formation, and user interactions.
  • Users tend to promote favored narratives, leading to polarized groups and informational cascades.
  • Confirmation bias plays a significant role in content sharing decisions and selective exposure.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantitatively investigate the mechanisms behind confirmation bias in social media.
  • To analyze the effect of challenge avoidance and reinforcement seeking on user behavior.
  • To understand the formation of polarized groups and echo chambers around conflicting narratives.

Main Methods:

  • Quantitative analysis of connectivity patterns among 1.2 million Facebook users.
  • Network-based approach to study information selection and diffusion.
  • Investigation of user engagement with scientific versus conspiracy news narratives.

Main Results:

  • Challenge avoidance leads to the formation of distinct, polarized user groups (echo chambers) with similar belief systems.
  • Reinforcement seeking drives content selection and diffusion, creating polarized sub-clusters within echo chambers.
  • User engagement with like-minded neighbors reinforces pre-existing beliefs, with peer influence amplifying this trend.

Conclusions:

  • Confirmation bias mechanisms significantly contribute to social media polarization.
  • Echo chambers and sub-clusters form due to challenge avoidance and reinforcement seeking.
  • Peer influence within social networks reinforces user beliefs and polarization.