Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026

In vitro Assessment of Aortic Regurgitation Using Four-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: February 25, 2022
Comparison of axial and coronal acquisitions by non-contrast-enhanced renal 3D MR angiography using flow-in
Junji Takahashi1, Yuki Ohmoto-Sekine2, Takashi Yoshida1
1Radiology Department, Toranomon Hospital, 2-2-2 Toranomon, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8470, Japan.
Objective:
We evaluated image quality differences between axial and coronal non-contrast-enhanced renal three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) acquisitions, using time-spatial labeling inversion pulse (Time-SLIP) with flow-in balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP).
Materials And Methods:
Axial and coronal images were acquired in 128 subjects using non-contrast-enhanced 3D-MRA with Time-SLIP flow-in bSSFP on a clinical 1.5-T MRI system. Visualization of source and maximum intensity projection (MIP) images of renal arteries were compared between the axial and coronal acquisitions using a four-point scale. For quantitative analysis, vessel-to-background contrast ratios of aorta and renal arteries were calculated.
Results:
Both acquisitions yielded similarly excellent quality. In source image evaluation, coronal acquisitions showed significantly more motion degradation (p < 0.01) than did axial acquisitions. In MIP image evaluation, coronal acquisitions yielded superior image quality, less motion degradation, and better visualization of the number of renal branches than did axial acquisition. The renal artery to background signal contrast was greater in coronal than in axial acquisitions (p < 0.01).
Conclusion:
Coronal acquisition provides superior contrast between the renal arteries and background and allows more persistent visualization than axial acquisitions in non-contrast-enhanced MRA using flow-in bSSFP with Time-SLIP. First-line screening of renal non-contrast-enhanced MRA should involve coronal acquisition.
Insights
Coronal non-contrast-enhanced renal MRA using Time-SLIP bSSFP offers superior renal artery visualization and contrast compared to axial views. This makes coronal acquisition the preferred method for initial screening.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
- Cardiovascular Imaging
Background:
- Non-contrast-enhanced renal magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is crucial for evaluating kidney vasculature.
- Optimizing image quality in MRA is essential for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare image quality between axial and coronal non-contrast-enhanced renal 3D-MRA acquisitions.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of time-spatial labeling inversion pulse (Time-SLIP) with flow-in balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) for renal MRA.
Main Methods:
- Acquired axial and coronal non-contrast-enhanced 3D-MRA images in 128 subjects using Time-SLIP flow-in bSSFP on a 1.5-T MRI system.
- Compared source and maximum intensity projection (MIP) images using a four-point scale.
- Quantitatively assessed vessel-to-background contrast ratios.
Main Results:
- Coronal acquisitions demonstrated superior image quality and better visualization of renal branches in MIP images compared to axial.
- Coronal acquisitions showed significantly less motion degradation in source images (p<0.01).
- Renal artery to background signal contrast was significantly greater in coronal than axial acquisitions (p<0.01).
Conclusions:
- Coronal acquisition provides superior contrast and persistent visualization of renal arteries in non-contrast-enhanced MRA.
- Coronal acquisition is recommended as the first-line screening method for renal non-contrast-enhanced MRA using Time-SLIP flow-in bSSFP.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography

