Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026

A Protocol to Characterize the Morphological Changes of Clostridium difficile in Response to Antibiotic Treatment
Published on: May 25, 2017
Impact of ribotype on Clostridioides difficile diagnostics
Kristina Rizzardi1, Thomas Åkerlund2, Torbjörn Norén3
1Department of Microbiology, Public Health Agency of Sweden, Solna, Sweden. Kristina.rizzardi@folkhalsomyndigheten.se.
Diagnostic test performance for Clostridioides difficile infection varied by PCR ribotype. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) and membrane EIAs showed highest overall accuracy, but sensitivity differed significantly across C. difficile types.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Diagnostic Science
Background:
- Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) diagnosis relies on various methods with differing performance.
- PCR ribotyping is crucial for understanding C. difficile epidemiology and virulence.
- Evaluating diagnostic accuracy requires considering the impact of prevalent C. difficile strains.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the performance of different diagnostic methods for CDI in Sweden.
- To investigate how PCR ribotype influences the sensitivity and specificity of these diagnostic tests.
- To provide insights into optimizing CDI diagnostics based on local C. difficile strain characteristics.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 17,878 stool samples tested between 2011-2016 across 26 laboratories.
- Comparison of enzyme immunoassays (EIAs), cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CTA), and nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs).
- PCR ribotyping of C. difficile isolates to determine toxigenicity and strain type, correlating with diagnostic test results.
Main Results:
- Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) and membrane-bound EIAs demonstrated the highest overall sensitivity and specificity.
- Significant variation in diagnostic sensitivity was observed across different PCR ribotypes, ranging from 33% to 100%.
- Methods showed 100% sensitivity for ribotypes 027 and 013, but lower sensitivity for prevalent types like 014, 020, and 001 (38-100%).
Conclusions:
- The performance of CDI diagnostic tests is significantly influenced by the distribution of C. difficile PCR ribotypes.
- Diagnostic test evaluations may be overestimated in settings with a high prevalence of specific ribotypes, such as ribotype 027.
- Accurate CDI diagnosis necessitates considering both the chosen method and the circulating C. difficile strain types.
More Related Videos
06:51Cefoperazone-treated Mouse Model of Clinically-relevant Clostridium difficile Strain R20291
Published on: December 10, 2016
09:12A Protein Microarray Assay for Serological Determination of Antigen-specific Antibody Responses Following Clostridium difficile Infection
Published on: June 15, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Real Time RT-PCR
The real-time quantification of the number of amplified products is...
Ribosome Profiling
Applications of ribosome profiling
Ribosome profiling has many applications, including in vivo monitoring of translation inside a particular organ or tissue type and quantifying new protein synthesis levels.
The technique...