Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
Published on: August 4, 2023
Hearing outcomes of cochlear implant recipients with pre-operatively identified cochlear dead regions
M K Shrivastava1, S T Eitutis1, J W Lee1
1Department of Otolaryngology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Abstract:
Objectives: To determine how patients who did not meet UK TA166 NICE criteria for cochlear implantation (CI) but were subsequently found to have cochlear dead regions (DRs) performed with CI.Methods: A retrospective review of medical records was performed on CI recipients: 152 controls and 40 in the DR group. Of these, 34 pairs were matched by pre-operative Bamford-Kowal-Bench (BKB) scores and compared.Results: The forty DR patients had a median age at implantation of 56 years. Their mean pre-operative BKB score of 23% increased to 78% after CI. Thirty-seven experienced improvements in BKB scores. In matched case-control analysis, the improvement in mean BKB score with CI was no different (p = 0.19) between the DR group and control group; a similar proportion of patients benefitted in each group.Discussion: This study is the largestreport to date of performance of patients with DRs, before and after CI. The DR group gain similar benefit as the controls.Conclusion: Patients with DRs, who did not meet TA166 NICE criteria, received the same benefit as those who did. TEN testing to detect DRs should be included in routine CI work-up where standard criteria are not met.

