Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 31, 2025
Home-Based Monitor for Gait and Activity Analysis
Published on: August 8, 2019
Walking velocity and modified rivermead mobility index as discriminatory measures for functional ambulation
Ji Young Lim1,2, Seung Heon An3, Dae-Sung Park1
1Department of Physical Therapy, Konyang University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Background:
The cut-off values of walking velocity and classification of functional mobility both have a role in clinical settings for assessing the walking function of stroke patients and setting rehabilitation goals and treatment plans.
Objective:
The present study investigated whether the cut-off values of the modified Rivermead Mobility Index (mRMI) and walking velocity accurately differentiated the walking ability of stroke patients according to the modified Functional Ambulation Category (mFAC).
Methods:
Eighty two chronic stroke patients were included in the study. The comfortable/maximum walking velocities and mRMI were used to measure the mobility outcomes of these patients. To compare the walking velocities and mRMI scores for each mFAC point, one-way analysis of variance and the post-hoc test using Scheffe's method were performed. The patients were categorized according to gait ability into either or mFAC VI group. The cut-off values for mRMI and walking velocities were calculated using a receiver-operating characteristic curve. The odds ratios of logistic regression analysis (Wald Forward) were analyzed to examine whether the cut-off values of walking velocity and mRMI can be utilized to differentiate functional walking levels.
Results:
Except for mFACs III and IV, maximum walking velocity differed between mFAC IV and mFAC V , between mFAC V and mFAC VI , and between mFAC VI and mFAC VII . The cut-off value of mRMI is and the area under the curve is 0.87, respectively; the cut-off value for comfortable walking velocity is m/s and the area under the curve is 0.92, respectively; also, the cut-off value for maximum walking velocity is m/s and the area under the curve is 0.97, respectively. In the logistic regression analysis, the maximum walking velocity m/s, and mRMI scores, are able to distinguish from mFAC VI.
Conclusion:
The cut-off values of maximum walking velocity and mRMI are recommended as useful outcome measures for assessing ambulation levels in chronic stroke patients during rehabilitation.
