Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 31, 2025

Isolation and Flow Cytometric Assessment of Neuroimmune Interactions in a Mini-Stroke Murine Model
Published on: June 20, 2025
Microglial IRF5-IRF4 regulatory axis regulates neuroinflammation after cerebral ischemia and impacts stroke outcomes
Abdullah Al Mamun1, Anjali Chauhan1, Shaohua Qi1
1Department of Neurology, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030.
Abstract:
Microglial activation plays a central role in poststroke inflammation and causes secondary neuronal damage; however, it also contributes in debris clearance and chronic recovery. Microglial pro- and antiinflammatory responses (or so-called M1-M2 phenotypes) coexist and antagonize each other throughout the disease progress. As a result of this balance, poststroke immune responses alter stroke outcomes. Our previous study found microglial expression of interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) and IRF4 was related to pro- and antiinflammatory responses, respectively. In the present study, we genetically modified the IRF5 and IRF4 signaling to explore their roles in stroke. Both in vitro and in vivo assays were utilized; IRF5 or IRF4 small interfering RNA (siRNA), lentivirus, and conditional knockout (CKO) techniques were employed to modulate IRF5 or IRF4 expression in microglia. We used a transient middle cerebral artery occlusion model to induce stroke and examined both acute and chronic stroke outcomes. Poststroke inflammation was evaluated with flow cytometry, RT-PCR, MultiPlex, and immunofluorescence staining. An oscillating pattern of the IRF5-IRF4 regulatory axis function was revealed. Down-regulation of IRF5 signaling by siRNA or CKO resulted in increased IRF4 expression, enhanced M2 activation, quenched proinflammatory responses, and improved stroke outcomes, whereas down-regulation of IRF4 led to increased IRF5 expression, enhanced M1 activation, exacerbated proinflammatory responses, and worse functional recovery. Up-regulation of IRF4 or IRF5 by lentivirus induced similar results. We conclude that the IRF5-IRF4 regulatory axis is a key determinant in microglial activation. The IRF5-IRF4 regulatory axis is a potential therapeutic target for neuroinflammation and ischemic stroke.
Insights
The IRF5-IRF4 axis regulates microglial activation in stroke. Modulating this axis impacts inflammation and recovery, offering a potential therapeutic target for neuroinflammation and ischemic stroke.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Immunology
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Microglial activation is crucial in stroke, influencing both damage and recovery through pro- and anti-inflammatory responses (M1/M2 phenotypes).
- Interferon regulatory factors (IRFs), specifically IRF5 and IRF4, have been linked to these opposing microglial inflammatory pathways.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the specific roles of the IRF5-IRF4 regulatory axis in microglial activation and post-stroke outcomes.
- To explore the therapeutic potential of targeting this axis for neuroinflammation and ischemic stroke.
Main Methods:
- Genetic modification of IRF5 and IRF4 signaling in microglia using small interfering RNA (siRNA), lentivirus, and conditional knockout (CKO) techniques.
- In vitro and in vivo studies utilizing a transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) stroke model.
- Evaluation of post-stroke inflammation and outcomes via flow cytometry, RT-PCR, MultiPlex assays, and immunofluorescence staining.
Main Results:
- An oscillating pattern in the IRF5-IRF4 regulatory axis function was observed.
- Down-regulation of IRF5 increased IRF4, promoted M2 activation, reduced inflammation, and improved stroke outcomes.
- Down-regulation of IRF4 increased IRF5, enhanced M1 activation, worsened inflammation, and impaired functional recovery.
Conclusions:
- The IRF5-IRF4 regulatory axis is a critical determinant of microglial activation states in the context of stroke.
- Targeting the IRF5-IRF4 axis presents a promising therapeutic strategy for managing neuroinflammation and improving outcomes in ischemic stroke.

