Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 31, 2025

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
Published on: January 31, 2017
How do memory modules differentially contribute to familiarity and recollection?
1Institute for Neural Computation, Ruhr University Bochum, 44801Bochum, Germany. olya.hakobyan@rub.desen.cheng@rub.dewww.rub.de/cns.
Abstract:
We fully support dissociating the subjective experience from the memory contents in recognition memory, as Bastin et al. posit in the target article. However, having two generic memory modules with qualitatively different functions is not mandatory and is in fact inconsistent with experimental evidence. We propose that quantitative differences in the properties of the memory modules can account for the apparent dissociation of recollection and familiarity along anatomical lines.
Related Concept Videos
Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory
Understanding Memory
Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory
Implicit Memories
One key aspect of implicit...
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...

