Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 31, 2025

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm
Published on: May 15, 2019
Using eye-tracking to understand relations between visual attention and language in children's spatial skills
Hilary E Miller1, Heather L Kirkorian2, Vanessa R Simmering3
1University of Wisconsin-Madison and McPherson Eye Research Institute, United States; Waisman Center, United States; Emory University, United States.
Language cues significantly improve children's spatial recall beyond visual attention. This study explored how spatial language and visual cues impact young children's memory for object locations.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
- Linguistics
Background:
- The relationship between children's spatial language and spatial skills is debated, with mixed evidence on whether language effects are unique or non-linguistic.
- Prior studies show language cues aid spatial performance more than visual cues, but non-verbal attention is a stronger predictor than language production.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the unique contributions of language and visual cues to spatial recall in young children.
- To compare the effectiveness of language cues versus visual cues in supporting spatial memory using eye-tracking.
Main Methods:
- Four- to five-year-old children participated in spatial recall tasks with varying cue conditions (language, visual, non-specific).
- Eye-tracking technology was employed during a delayed spatial recall task involving array rotation to monitor visual attention.
- Children completed a baseline task followed by a cue-manipulation task to assess cue effectiveness.
Main Results:
- Language cues were the most effective in facilitating spatial recall compared to visual or non-specific cues.
- Both language and visual cues directed children's visual attention, supporting recall.
- Visual attention partially mediated the effect of language, indicating language has unique influences beyond attention direction.
Conclusions:
- Spatial language offers unique benefits for spatial recall that extend beyond its role in directing visual attention.
- Language may provide a more coherent or redundant coding of visual information, or pragmatically signal relevance.
- Findings suggest language influences spatial cognition through both attentional and non-attentional mechanisms, offering insights into developmental processes.
More Related Videos
07:36Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
Published on: November 30, 2018
07:09Gaze in Action: Head-mounted Eye Tracking of Children's Dynamic Visual Attention During Naturalistic Behavior
Published on: November 14, 2018