Skeletal trauma reporting; perceptions and experiences of radiographer practitioners exposed to the reporting role

Increased demand for diagnostic imaging and professional body directives have resulted in radiographer reporting which requires postgraduate education due to the associated high degree of autonomy and complex decision making. Little research has focused on the transition from practitioner to the skeletal trauma reporting role.

Two-phase, qualitative research using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) explored perceptions and experiences. Phase 2, one-one, semi-structured interviews (n = 6) were recorded, transcribed verbatim and reviewed using the IPA six stage thematic analysis, generating three super-ordinate themes. Researcher reflexivity, ethics and quality assessment were considered.

This paper reflects the IPA generated from Super-ordinate Theme 2; Exposure to the reporting role. Participant reflections indicated positive opinion with agreement that combining the reporting role with the diagnostic radiographer role enhanced practice and increased job satisfaction. Potential for stress associated with increased responsibility and accountability was described but there was recognition that skeletal trauma reporting was what they had chosen and been educated to do.

The interpretative approach and IPA for Super-ordinate Theme 2, fills a gap in existing knowledge, providing a unique and valuable insight into perceptions and experiences of practitioners as they became exposed to the skeletal reporting role.

Participants were on their journey to advanced practice with plans to further develop their role. Excellent clinical practice had been demonstrated as well as facilitating learning with others. If there is expectation to achieve all domains associated with advanced practitioner status then time, commitment and support is essential from employers and management.