Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 31, 2025

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
Leveraging historical data into oncology development programs: Two case studies of phase 2 Bayesian augmented control
Claire L Smith1, Zachary Thomas2, Nathan Enas2
1Eli Lilly and Company, Surrey, UK.
Leveraging historical data in phase 2 clinical trials using Bayesian augmented control (BAC) designs can improve drug development efficiency. These methods reduce sample size and study duration, offering significant benefits for novel therapy development.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials Methodology
- Biostatistics
- Oncology Drug Development
Background:
- Historical data integration in clinical trials can enhance efficiency.
- Challenges include potential bias and power loss if historical and current data are inconsistent.
- Prognostic factor adjustment is crucial when utilizing historical information.
Purpose of the Study:
- To illustrate the application of Bayesian augmented control (BAC) designs in oncology phase 2 trials.
- To demonstrate how historical data can improve trial efficiency and reduce sample size.
- To explore methods for adjusting for prognostic factors and assessing data consistency.
Main Methods:
- Application of Bayesian augmented control (BAC) designs in two oncology case studies (glioblastoma and pancreatic cancer).
- Utilizing an informative prior for control arm hazard rate in one study.
- Employing a hierarchical model for data borrowing, allowing the extent of borrowing to be data-driven.
- Incorporating Bayesian analyses with adjustments for prognostic factors.
Main Results:
- Sample size savings of 15% to 20% were achieved in the glioblastoma study using a BAC design.
- The hierarchical model enabled data-driven borrowing, adapting to the consistency between observed and historical data.
- Bayesian analyses effectively adjusted for prognostic factors, enhancing the reliability of results.
Conclusions:
- Incorporating historical data through Bayesian trial design offers substantial sample size and duration savings.
- This approach facilitates a more scientific and efficient development of novel therapies by optimizing control arm recruitment.
- Sensitivity analyses are essential for robust interpretation, and patient-level data transparency aids in adjusting for prognostic imbalances.
More Related Videos
07:41Performing Data Mining And Integrative Analysis Of Biomarker in Breast Cancer Using Multiple Publicly Accessible Databases
Published on: May 17, 2019
07:40Preparation of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Pellets and Plasma from a Single Blood Draw at Clinical Trial Sites for Biomarker Analysis
Published on: March 20, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Clinical Trials: Overview
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...