The Effect of Sub-Threshold Pre-Pulses on Neural Activation Depends on Electrode Configuration

Published research on nerve stimulation with sub-threshold conditioning pre-pulses is contradictory. Like most early research on electrical stimulation (ES), the pioneer work on the use of pre-pulses was modelled and measured only for monopolar electrodes. However, many contemporary ES applications, including miniaturized neuromodulation implants, known as electroceuticals, operate in bipolar mode.

We compared depolarizing (DPPs) and hyperpolarizing (HPPs) pre-pulses on neural excitability in rat nerve with monopolar and bipolar electrodes. The rat common peroneal nerve was stimulated with biphasic stimuli with and without ramp and square DPPs or HPPs of 1, 5 and 10 ms duration and 10%-20% of the amplitude of the following pulse.

The effects were opposite for the monopolar and bipolar configurations. With monopolar electrodes DPPs increased the amplitude required to activate 50% of the motoneuron pool (between 0.7% and 10.3%) and HPPs decreased the threshold (between 1.7% and 4.7%). With bipolar electrodes both pre-pulse types had the opposite effect: DPPs decreased thresholds (between 1.8% and 5.5%) whereas HPPs increased thresholds (between 0.5% and 4.1%). Electroneurograms from the stimulated nerve revealed spatial and temporal differences in action potential generation for monopolar and bipolar electrodes. In bipolar biphasic stimulation, excitation first occurred at the return electrode as a response to the transition between the cathodic and anodic phase.

These data help to resolve the contradictions in the published data over two decades.

They also show that fundamental research carried out in monopolar configuration is not directly applicable to contemporary bipolar ES applications.