Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 31, 2025

Handheld Metal Detector Screening for Metallic Foreign Body Ingestion in Children
Published on: September 11, 2018
Predictors of Outcomes in Endoscopies for Foreign Body Ingestion: A Cross-Sectional Study
Jason Saltiel1, Rebecca Molinsky2, Benjamin Lebwohl3,2,4
1Department of Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 630 West 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, USA. Jason.Saltiel@nyulangone.org.
Background:
As foreign body ingestion/food impaction is one of the less common indications for upper endoscopy in adults, few studies have investigated outcomes. We aimed to determine the distribution of ingested items warranting endoscopy and to identify factors associated with successful endoscopic retrieval.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study, identifying all endoscopies performed between June 2006 and June 2018 for foreign body ingestion or food impaction. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses to identify variables associated with endoscopic foreign body visualization and successful removal from the mouth.
Results:
Of the 168 endoscopies identified, the ingested item was visualized in 131 (78%) and was removed from the mouth in 88 (52.4%). 6.5% of cases required surgery and 2.4% of cases had a perforation noted. The two most common foreign bodies were food boluses (51.2%) and bones (28.6%). Older patients were more likely to have their ingested foreign body visualized during endoscopy (age ≥ 70 compared to 18-29 adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 8.78; 95% CI 1.62-47.70) and more likely to have it removed from the mouth (aOR 5.57; 95% CI 1.34-22.85). Bones were less likely to be visualized on endoscopy (aOR 0.16; 95% CI 0.04-0.57) but not less likely to be removed successfully (aOR 0.85; 95% CI 0.42-1.72). Foreign bodies visible on radiography were more likely to be identified on endoscopy (aOR 9.07; 95% CI 2.71-30.37) and more likely to be successfully removed (aOR 2.82; 95% CI 1.26-6.32).
Conclusions:
Factors such as age, radiographic visibility, and the suspected foreign body may affect the likelihood that it can be visualized and removed. Future studies should focus on further characterizing complications of foreign body ingestions and the types of patients and objects most at risk.
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Upper GI Series: Barium Swallow
Purpose and Procedure
Patients undergoing this procedure ingest a liquid containing barium sulfate with a chalky...
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.

