Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 31, 2025

23:53
Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease
Published on: April 29, 2007
8.3K
Scientists' incentives and attitudes toward public communication
Kathleen M Rose1, Ezra M Markowitz2, Dominique Brossard3,4
1Institute for Writing and Rhetoric, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755.
Summary
Scientists support science communication, but institutional backing and confidence in skills are needed for effective public engagement. This research surveyed faculty to understand these challenges.
Area of Science:
- Science communication and public engagement.
Background:
- Communicating science is crucial due to complex global challenges and scientific advancements.
- There's a growing demand for science communication across various sectors.
- Evaluating the scientific community's stance on public-facing communication is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the current position of the scientific community regarding science communication.
- To identify factors influencing scientists' engagement in public-facing communication.
- To inform strategies for developing future science communicators and research.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive census of science faculty was conducted.
- The study focused on faculty at land-grant universities in the United States.
- Data was collected to analyze faculty perceptions and involvement in science communication.
Main Results:
- Scientists generally express strong approval for science communication initiatives.
- Key challenges identified include a lack of adequate institutional support.
- Limited confidence in communication skills among scientists poses a constraint.
Conclusions:
- While scientists value public engagement, institutional structures must evolve to support these efforts.
- Enhancing scientists' communication skills and providing robust institutional backing are critical.
- Addressing these tensions can foster a more effective next generation of science communicators.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology
476
Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
476
Social Proof
31.4K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
31.4K
Ethics in Research
25.3K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
25.3K
The Scientific Method
255.1K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
255.1K
The Scientific Method
64.1K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.
64.1K
The Scientific Method
64.5K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
64.5K

