Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 31, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Differences in the Receipt of Low-Value Services Between Publicly and Privately Insured Children
Kao-Ping Chua1, Aaron L Schwartz2, Anna Volerman3,4
1Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; chuak@med.umich.edu.
Insights
Publicly and privately insured children receive similar rates of low-value health services. These findings suggest that efforts to reduce wasteful care should target all children, irrespective of their insurance type.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Health Services Research
- Health Economics
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
Background:
- Children often receive low-value healthcare services that do not enhance health outcomes.
- There is limited understanding of potential disparities in low-value service receipt between publicly and privately insured children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence of low-value healthcare services among publicly versus privately insured children.
- To identify if insurance type influences the utilization of potentially wasteful medical care in pediatric populations.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 2013-2014 Medicaid Analytic eXtract and IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims databases.
- Inclusion of 20 low-value care measures across diagnostic testing, imaging, and prescription drugs.
- Comparison of service receipt proportions between publicly and privately insured children in 12 states for 2014.
Main Results:
- 11.0% of publicly insured children and 8.9% of privately insured children received at least one low-value service.
- Rates for receiving services multiple times or specific types (diagnostic, imaging, drugs) showed modest differences between insurance groups.
- The median difference in eligible children receiving services was small (+0.3 percentage points), indicating similar patterns.
Conclusions:
- Approximately 1 in 9 publicly insured and 1 in 11 privately insured children received low-value services in 2014.
- The study found modest differences in low-value care receipt based on insurance type, suggesting payer mix is not a primary driver of wasteful spending.
- Recommendations emphasize universal strategies to reduce low-value care across all pediatric populations, regardless of insurance coverage.
Background:
Children frequently receive low-value services that do not improve health, but it is unknown whether the receipt of these services differs between publicly and privately insured children.
Methods:
We analyzed 2013-2014 Medicaid Analytic eXtract and IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters databases. Using 20 measures of low-value care (6 diagnostic testing measures, 5 imaging measures, and 9 prescription drug measures), we compared the proportion of publicly and privately insured children in 12 states who received low-value services at least once or twice in 2014; the proportion of publicly and privately insured children who received low-value diagnostic tests, imaging tests, and prescription drugs at least once; and the proportion of publicly and privately insured children eligible for each measure who received the service at least once.
Results:
Among 6 951 556 publicly insured children and 1 647 946 privately insured children, respectively, 11.0% and 8.9% received low-value services at least once, 3.9% and 2.8% received low-value services at least twice, 3.2% and 3.8% received low-value diagnostic tests at least once, 0.4% and 0.4% received low-value imaging tests at least once, and 8.4% and 5.5% received low-value prescription drug services at least once. Differences in the proportion of eligible children receiving each service were typically small (median difference among 20 measures, public minus private: +0.3 percentage points).
Conclusions:
In 2014, 1 in 9 publicly insured and 1 in 11 privately insured children received low-value services. Differences between populations were modest overall, suggesting that wasteful care is not highly associated with payer type. Efforts to reduce this care should target all populations regardless of payer mix.
More Related Videos
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
05:56Implementation of Non-invasive Point of Care Transient Elastography for Evaluation of Liver Disease in Pediatric Populations with Cystic Fibrosis
Published on: August 29, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children