Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

357
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
357
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs01:09

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs

417
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched pairs evaluates the null hypothesis by combining the ranks of differences with their signs. It essentially tests whether the median of the differences in a population of matched pairs is zero. Since the test incorporates more information than the sign test, it generally yields more trustable conclusions. This test also does not require the data to follow a normal distribution, but two conditions must be met for it to be applicable: (1) the data must...
417
Spearman's Rank Correlation Test01:20

Spearman's Rank Correlation Test

1.4K
Spearman's rank correlation test, also known as Spearman's rho, is a nonparametric method for assessing the strength and direction of association between two variables. This test is particularly valuable when the data distribution is unknown or when the assumption of normality does not hold. Named after the English psychologist and statistician Dr. Charles Edward Spearman, it serves as the nonparametric counterpart to Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Spearman's test calculates correlation by...
1.4K
Weighted Mean00:57

Weighted Mean

6.2K
While taking the arithmetic, geometric, or harmonic mean of a sample data set, equal importance is assigned to all the data points. However, all the values may not always be equally important in some data sets. An intrinsic bias might make it more important to give more weightage to specific values over others.
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
6.2K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

3.8K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.8K
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

397
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
397

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bone Morphogenetic Proteins in Anterior Cervical Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

World neurosurgery·2017
Same author

Development of the AOSpine Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma (AOSpine PROST): a universal disease-specific outcome instrument for individuals with traumatic spinal column injury.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2017
Same author

The Role of Multimodal Analgesia in Spine Surgery.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons·2017
Same author

Evidence-Based Recommendations for Spine Surgery.

Spine·2017
Same author

Does Medicaid Insurance Confer Adequate Access to Adult Orthopaedic Care in the Era of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act?

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2017
Same author

Value-based Insurance Design.

Clinical spine surgery·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 31, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.0K

Propensity Score Matching: A Statistical Method.

Liam T Kane1, Taolin Fang, Matthew S Galetta

  • 1Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA.

Clinical Spine Surgery
|January 9, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Propensity score matching (PSM) is a statistical method used in orthopedic research to reduce bias in observational studies. It creates a comparable control group by matching subjects based on their likelihood of receiving treatment.

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.9K
Influence of Emotional Factors on the Efficacy of Acupuncture Treatment for Overweight Complicated with Hyperlipidemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study
03:05

Influence of Emotional Factors on the Efficacy of Acupuncture Treatment for Overweight Complicated with Hyperlipidemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Published on: November 21, 2025

404

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 31, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.0K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.9K
Influence of Emotional Factors on the Efficacy of Acupuncture Treatment for Overweight Complicated with Hyperlipidemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study
03:05

Influence of Emotional Factors on the Efficacy of Acupuncture Treatment for Overweight Complicated with Hyperlipidemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Published on: November 21, 2025

404

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biostatistics
  • Observational Research

Background:

  • Confounding bias is a significant challenge in orthopedic surgery research, particularly in observational studies where randomization is not feasible.
  • Traditional methods like multiple regression analysis may not fully address complex confounding factors.
  • Propensity score matching (PSM) offers an alternative approach to mitigate bias in these settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the principles and application of Propensity Score Matching (PSM) in orthopedic surgery research.
  • To illustrate the utility of PSM in creating a balanced control group for observational studies.
  • To highlight the advantages and limitations of PSM for researchers in the orthopedic field.

Main Methods:

  • Propensity score matching (PSM) involves calculating a propensity score for each subject, representing their probability of receiving treatment based on observed covariates.
  • Treated subjects are then matched with control subjects who have similar propensity scores.
  • This matching process creates a new control group, effectively reducing confounding bias from pre-existing covariates.

Main Results:

  • PSM successfully reduces the influence of confounding covariates by establishing a more comparable control group.
  • The method allows for a more accurate measurement of the treatment effect by minimizing pre-treatment differences between groups.
  • An example from orthopedic spine literature demonstrates the practical application of PSM.

Conclusions:

  • Propensity score matching is a valuable and relatively simple statistical technique for addressing confounding bias in orthopedic observational research.
  • While effective, PSM requires data exclusion and is primarily suited for binary treatment comparisons.
  • Understanding PSM is beneficial for orthopedic researchers due to its increasing prevalence in the literature.