Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 31, 2025

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Quality of Care for Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure in China
Aakriti Gupta1,2, Yuan Yu3,4,5,6,7, Qi Tan8
1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Insights
Heart failure care in China shows significant room for improvement, with low adherence to key quality measures across hospitals. A national strategy is needed to standardize and enhance heart failure (HF) patient care quality.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Public Health
- Health Services Research
Background:
- China faces a growing epidemic of heart failure (HF), necessitating urgent attention to the quality of care provided.
- Monitoring and improving HF care quality is a critical public health priority in the region.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the quality of inpatient heart failure (HF) care in China by assessing adherence to established quality measures.
- To identify factors influencing the quality of HF care at the hospital level.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter, retrospective, cross-sectional study analyzed medical records of 10,004 heart failure (HF) hospitalizations from 189 hospitals across China (2015 data).
- Adherence to four core performance measures was assessed: left ventricular ejection fraction assessment, evidence-based medication prescription (beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors/ARBs), and scheduled follow-up appointments.
- A composite performance score was calculated for each hospital.
Main Results:
- Overall adherence to quality measures was low, with median adherence rates ranging from 11.5% for follow-up appointments to 66.7% for LVEF assessment.
- The median composite performance score across hospitals was 40.0%, indicating significant variability in care quality.
- Significant hospital-level variations in adherence rates were observed for all four measures.
Conclusions:
- The quality of heart failure (HF) care in Chinese hospitals appears to be suboptimal, with substantial heterogeneity among institutions.
- Findings underscore the urgent need for a national initiative to standardize and improve the quality of HF care delivery throughout China.
Importance:
Given the emerging heart failure (HF) epidemic in China, monitoring and improving the quality of care for heart failure is a top priority.
Objectives:
To assess the quality of HF care provided to inpatients by examining the adherence to quality measures for HF care at the hospital level and to identify factors associated with the quality of care.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
In this multicenter, hospital-based, retrospective cross-sectional study in China, medical records of patients hospitalized for HF from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2015, were analyzed from January 1, 2018, to May 20, 2019. In the first stage, simple random sampling stratified by economic-geographical regions in China was used to generate a list of participating hospitals. In the second stage, 15 538 hospitalizations from the 189 selected hospitals were systematically sampled, and 10 004 HF hospitalizations were included in the final sample.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
Adherence to the following 4 core performance measures at the hospital level: (1) left ventricular ejection fraction assessment during hospitalization; (2) evidence-based β-blocker (bisoprolol, carvedilol, or metoprolol succinate) for eligible patients at discharge; (3) angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers for eligible patients at discharge; and (4) scheduled follow-up appointment at discharge. At the hospital level, a composite performance score (ranging from 0-1) was also calculated by averaging these measures.
Results:
In total, 10 004 hospital admissions for HF at 189 hospitals were included in this study. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) patient age at admission was 73 (65-80) years, and 5117 (51.1%) of the patients were men. Among all hospitals, the median rate of adherence to measure 1 was 66.7% (IQR, 45.5%-80.7%; range, 0%-100%). The rate for adherence to measure 2 was 14.8% (IQR, 0%-37.5%; range, 0%-81.8%), and the rate for measure 3 was 57.1% (IQR, 36.4%-75.0%; range, 0%-100%). For measure 4, the median rate of adherence was 11.5% (IQR, 3.3%-32.8%; range, 0%-96.7%). The median (IQR) composite performance score across all hospitals was 40.0% (26.9%-51.9%), with a range from 2.2% to 85.4%. The median odds ratios of adherence were 2.2 (95% CI, 2.0-2.4) for measure 1, 2.1 (95% CI, 1.8-2.4) for measure 2, 2.4 (95% CI, 2.0-2.9 for measure 3, and 4.8 (95% CI, 3.9-5.8) for measure 4 among hospitals.
Conclusions And Relevance:
The findings of this study suggest that quality of care for patients with HF in China may be substandard, and there is wide heterogeneity in the quality of care for HF among hospitals. The findings also suggest the need for a national strategy to improve and standardize the quality of HF care in China.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure I: Introduction
