Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Vasectomy: how much is enough?

R I Hallan1, A R May

  • 1Department of Surgery, Colchester General Hospital.

British Journal of Urology
|October 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Letter 3: randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer (Br J Surg 2009; 96: 982-989).

The British journal of surgery·2009
Same author

A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial of oral indoramin to treat chronic anal fissure.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2003
Same author

Anal sphincter function: fecal incontinence and its treatment.

Surgery annual·1993
Same author

Evidence from dynamic integrated proctography to redefine anismus.

The British journal of surgery·1992
Same author

Transmetatarsal amputation in patients with peripheral vascular disease.

European journal of vascular surgery·1991
Same author

Development of an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter.

Lancet (London, England)·1991
Same journal

Removal of ureteric calculus by the ureteric corkscrew in a case of calculous anuria.

British journal of urology·2010
Same journal

Obstructive anuria, probably due to calculus.

British journal of urology·2010
Same journal

The incidence of signs of renal injury following prolonged burial under debris in an unselected series of 764 airraid casualties admitted to hospital.

British journal of urology·2010
Same journal

Contribution to the etiology of acquired fibrosis of the bladder neck.

British journal of urology·2010
Same journal

True infective abacterial pyuria.

British journal of urology·2010
Same journal

A malignant right kidney removed at operation, together with a short length of the vena cava.

British journal of urology·2010
See all related articles

To prevent vasectomy failure, removing at least 7 cm of vas deferens is needed. However, this length may complicate reversal, suggesting a combined approach for effective vasectomy.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Surgical Techniques
  • Male Reproductive Health

Background:

  • Vasectomy is a common surgical procedure for male sterilization.
  • Vasectomy failure can occur due to spontaneous recanalisation or inadequate vasal separation.
  • Sperm granulomas are a known complication associated with vasectomy failure.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the correlation between the length of vas deferens excised during vasectomy and the resulting separation of the vasa.
  • To determine the optimal length of vas excision required to prevent vasectomy failure.
  • To assess the feasibility and implications of extensive vasectomy excision on subsequent vasovasostomy.

Main Methods:

  • Bilateral vasectomy was performed in 30 male participants.
Keywords:
BiologyClinical ResearchContraceptionContraception FailureContraceptive UsageFamily PlanningGenitaliaGenitalia, MaleMale SterilizationPhysiologyResearch MethodologyReversible SterilizationSterilization ReversalSterilization, SexualUrogenital SystemVas DeferensVas ReanastomosisVasectomy

Related Experiment Videos

  • Radio-opaque ligatures were used to tie the vasa.
  • X-rays were utilized to measure the separation between the ligated ends of the vasa.

    • Main Results:

    • A strong correlation was observed between the length of vas excised and the separation of the markers.
    • Excision of at least 7 cm of vas deferens is necessary to achieve separation exceeding that of sperm granulomas.
    • Excision of this length may lead to complications during vasovasostomy.

    Conclusions:

    • Achieving adequate vasal separation for preventing vasectomy failure requires significant vas deferens excision.
    • Extensive vasectomy excision poses challenges for future vasovasostomy reversal.
    • A combined approach, including vas excision and an additional method, is recommended to prevent spontaneous recanalisation and ensure long-term vasectomy efficacy.