Performance of ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes for identifying children with Sickle Cell Anemia

Sarah L Reeves1,2, Brian Madden1, Meng Wu3

  • 1Susan B Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Health Services Research
|January 10, 2020
PubMed

Insights

A new case definition accurately identifies children with sickle cell anemia (SCA) using ICD-10-CM claims data. This method aids in monitoring healthcare trends for SCA patients.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Hematology
  • Health Services Research
  • Medical Informatics

Background:

  • Accurate identification of pediatric sickle cell anemia (SCA) is crucial for effective healthcare management and research.
  • Transitioning to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) necessitates validated methods for case ascertainment.
  • Existing methods for identifying SCA in administrative data may require refinement for optimal performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop, test, and validate ICD-10-CM claims-based case definitions for identifying children with sickle cell anemia (SCA).
  • To assess the performance of various case definitions using sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve.
  • To establish a reliable methodology for monitoring SCA patient populations in administrative datasets.

Main Methods:

  • Secondary data analysis of Medicaid administrative claims (2016) and newborn screening records from Michigan and New York.
  • Application of 23 distinct case definitions using specific and nonspecific ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes (D57x).
  • Performance evaluation of case definitions against newborn screening results as the gold standard.

Main Results:

  • A case definition requiring at least one outpatient visit with an SCA-related or D571 code demonstrated the highest performance.
  • This optimal definition achieved a 95% sensitivity and 92% specificity in Michigan Medicaid data.
  • The same definition showed high performance in New York Medicaid data with 94% sensitivity and 86% specificity.

Conclusions:

  • A straightforward case definition utilizing ICD-10-CM codes can accurately identify children with SCA in administrative claims.
  • This validated methodology supports the monitoring of trends and healthcare service utilization in pediatric SCA populations.
  • The findings facilitate improved public health surveillance and research following the adoption of ICD-10-CM coding.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Classification of Illness01:17

Classification of Illness

The meaning of illness is individualized to each person who experiences an alteration in health. In contrast, disease is a medical term indicating a pathological change in the structure and function of the body or mind. It is a condition that has specific symptoms and boundaries.
An illness is a response to a disease in which the person's level of functioning is changed compared with a previous level. The general classification of illness includes acute and chronic.
Acute illness is severe...
8.4K
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis01:10

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

The nurse documents nursing diagnoses and enters them into the patient record. The identified patient's nursing diagnosis is either written out with a plan of care or entered into the electronic health record.
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
1.6K
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions01:29

Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions

Creating and executing a nursing diagnosis helps nurses plan care and guide patient, family, and community interventions. They are developed based on a patient's physical evaluation and support measuring the outcomes. It is not recommended to select random interventions throughout the planning process. Instead, consider the following six essential factors when choosing interventions:
3.0K