Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Integrated mesenchymal and extracellular cues drive bioengineered liver tissue formation and function.

Materials today. Bio·2026
Same author

From microtissues to macro solutions - The future of scalable and automated cartilage tissue engineering.

Journal of orthopaedic translation·2026
Same author

Correction: Comparison of <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> toxicity of bupivacaine in musculoskeletal applications.

Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Co-Culture of Mammalian Cells and Photosynthetic Microorganisms for Oxygen Supply in Engineered Tissues.

Cell proliferation·2026
Same author

Advances in light-based 3D bioprinting.

Biofabrication·2026
Same author

Refining the biomanufacturing of microalgae-derived extracellular vesicles as a potential nanotherapeutic for osteoarthritis.

Regenerative biomaterials·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 31, 2025

Ceramic Omnidirectional Bioprinting in Cell-Laden Suspensions for the Generation of Bone Analogs
10:19

Ceramic Omnidirectional Bioprinting in Cell-Laden Suspensions for the Generation of Bone Analogs

Published on: August 8, 2022

2.3K

Combining multi-scale 3D printing technologies to engineer reinforced hydrogel-ceramic interfaces.

Paweena Diloksumpan1, Mylène de Ruijter, Miguel Castilho

  • 1Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.

Biofabrication
|January 10, 2020
PubMed
Summary

This study explores how combining two 3D printing methods—extrusion printing and melt electrowriting—can create a composite plug for bone and cartilage regeneration. The plug includes a ceramic bone support and a hydrogel cartilage compartment. The design enhances adhesion between the two materials and provides mechanical reinforcement. The ceramic component supports bone growth in the lab, while the hydrogel supports cartilage matrix formation. The plug remains stable during handling and implantation. The findings suggest that this multi-scale printing approach could be useful for tissue engineering applications.

Keywords:
multi-scale 3D printingtissue engineeringosteochondral regenerationhydrogel-ceramic interface

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

An Additive Manufacturing Technique for the Facile and Rapid Fabrication of Hydrogel-based Micromachines with Magnetically Responsive Components
08:17

An Additive Manufacturing Technique for the Facile and Rapid Fabrication of Hydrogel-based Micromachines with Magnetically Responsive Components

Published on: July 18, 2018

7.5K
Microgel-Extracellular Matrix Composite Support for the Embedded 3D Printing of Human Neural Constructs
07:48

Microgel-Extracellular Matrix Composite Support for the Embedded 3D Printing of Human Neural Constructs

Published on: May 5, 2023

1.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 31, 2025

Ceramic Omnidirectional Bioprinting in Cell-Laden Suspensions for the Generation of Bone Analogs
10:19

Ceramic Omnidirectional Bioprinting in Cell-Laden Suspensions for the Generation of Bone Analogs

Published on: August 8, 2022

2.3K
An Additive Manufacturing Technique for the Facile and Rapid Fabrication of Hydrogel-based Micromachines with Magnetically Responsive Components
08:17

An Additive Manufacturing Technique for the Facile and Rapid Fabrication of Hydrogel-based Micromachines with Magnetically Responsive Components

Published on: July 18, 2018

7.5K
Microgel-Extracellular Matrix Composite Support for the Embedded 3D Printing of Human Neural Constructs
07:48

Microgel-Extracellular Matrix Composite Support for the Embedded 3D Printing of Human Neural Constructs

Published on: May 5, 2023

1.8K

Area of Science:

  • Tissue engineering within biomedical materials science
  • 3D printing in regenerative medicine
  • Bioceramics in orthopedic applications

Background:

Tissue interfaces in musculoskeletal systems are complex structures requiring precise mechanical and biological integration. Prior research has shown that single-material scaffolds often fail to replicate the mechanical and structural diversity of native tissues. This gap motivated the development of multi-material constructs that mimic natural tissue interfaces. Established knowledge includes the use of hydrogels for cartilage and bioceramics for bone, but integration remains a challenge. No prior work had resolved how to effectively combine these materials at multiple scales. The need for a mechanically stable interface in osteochondral defects has driven innovation in 3D printing technologies. Microscale organization of fibres is known to influence tissue function, but its application in composite scaffolds is limited. The challenge lies in preserving micro-architecture during multi-material printing. This paper introduces a novel approach to address these limitations.

Purpose Of The Study:

This study aimed to develop a composite osteochondral plug using multi-scale 3D printing technologies. The specific problem addressed is the lack of mechanically stable interfaces between bone and cartilage in tissue engineering. The motivation stems from the need for constructs that can withstand surgical handling and provide structural support in osteochondral defects. The authors propose integrating extrusion printing and melt electrowriting to achieve this. A key objective was to engineer a reinforced interface between a ceramic bone support and a hydrogel cartilage compartment. The study sought to evaluate mechanical reinforcement and biological functionality of the composite plug. The approach was designed to preserve micro-architecture while enabling spatial organization of fibres. The ultimate goal was to create a construct suitable for regenerative applications in musculoskeletal tissues.

Main Methods:

The researchers combined extrusion printing and melt electrowriting to fabricate a composite osteochondral plug. A bioceramic ink composed of α-tricalcium phosphate, nanohydroxyapatite, and a poloxamer was extrusion printed as a bone support. Melt electrowriting was used to create spatially organized polycaprolactone microfibres as a cartilage compartment. The mild setting reaction of the ceramic ink allowed printing within the microfibrous mesh. The ceramic-integrated mesh extended into the hydrogel region of the plug. Gelatin-based hydrogels, loaded with chondroprogenitor cells, were embedded around the mesh. The interlocking design was tested for adhesion strength using mechanical assays. The composite construct was evaluated for structural stability during handling and ex vivo implantation.

Main Results:

The interlocking design increased hydrogel-to-ceramic adhesion strength by more than 6.5-fold compared to non-interlocking structures. The MEW mesh provided compressive reinforcement in the chondral compartment, reaching 20-fold improvement over pristine hydrogels. The ceramic bone support demonstrated osteogenic potential in vitro. The cartilage compartment supported matrix deposition by chondroprogenitor cells. The neo-synthesized cartilage matrix further reinforced the interface. The composite plug retained structural stability during handling and ex vivo implantation. The osteal compartment showed evidence of bone formation in vitro. The chondral compartment exhibited compressive properties similar to native cartilage.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that the multi-material, multi-scale 3D printing approach offers a promising strategy for engineering composite constructs. The interlocking design enhances adhesion strength at the bone-to-cartilage interface. The MEW mesh contributes to mechanical reinforcement in the cartilage compartment. The ceramic ink supports osteogenesis in vitro. The hydrogel compartment facilitates cartilage matrix deposition. The composite plug maintains structural integrity during handling and implantation. The study suggests that this approach could be applied to musculoskeletal and connective tissue interfaces. The findings support the potential of multi-scale printing in regenerative medicine.

The interlocking design increased hydrogel-to-ceramic adhesion strength by more than 6.5-fold compared to non-interlocking structures.

Melt electrowriting creates spatially organized polycaprolactone microfibres that reinforce the chondral compartment.

The mild setting reaction allowed printing within the melt electrowritten mesh without disrupting its micro-architecture.

The hydrogel, loaded with chondroprogenitor cells, supports cartilage matrix deposition and mechanical reinforcement.

The chondral compartment showed compressive properties approaching native cartilage, with 20-fold reinforcement.

The authors suggest that this multi-scale printing approach could advance the engineering of musculoskeletal tissue interfaces.