Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 31, 2025

Application of Optical Coherence Tomography to a Mouse Model of Retinopathy
Published on: January 12, 2022
Comparison of retinal layer thickness measurements obtained using two different swept-source optical coherence
Yo Sep Yoon1, Chang Uk Park1, Jun Ho Song1
1Department of Ophthalmology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, 887 Bangeojinsunhwando-ro, Dong-gu, Ulsan, 44033, Republic of Korea.
Swept-source optical coherence tomography (OCT) 3D wide mode offers reliable full retinal thickness measurements. However, the 12 radial wide scan protocol shows segmentation errors for retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL) thickness.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is crucial for retinal imaging.
- Swept-source OCT offers advanced visualization of retinal layers.
- Accurate segmentation is vital for quantitative retinal analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare retinal layer thickness measurements between two swept-source OCT wide scan modes.
- To evaluate the reliability of automated and semi-automated segmentation for different retinal layers.
Main Methods:
- Fifty-four healthy eyes underwent OCT imaging using 3D wide and 12 radial wide scan protocols.
- Measurements included full retinal, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL) thicknesses.
- Segmentation methods included fully automated and semi-automated correction.
Main Results:
- Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for full retinal thickness were high (0.958-0.996) for both protocols.
- ICCs for GC-IPL thickness ranged from 0.754-0.918.
- ICCs for RNFL thickness showed significant variability (0.013-0.727).
Conclusions:
- Fully automated segmentation in 3D wide mode provides reliable full retinal thickness measurements.
- The 12 radial wide scan protocol with fully automated segmentation demonstrated segmentation errors for RNFL and GC-IPL.
- Clinical acceptability of RNFL and GC-IPL measurements varies between the two OCT protocols.
More Related Videos
12:22Multimodal Volumetric Retinal Imaging by Oblique Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy oSLO and Optical Coherence Tomography OCT
Published on: August 4, 2018
03:35Determining Gender-Based Differences in Retinal and Choroidal Thickness in Underweight Individuals via Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: December 1, 2023