Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 31, 2025

Harvesting Sperm and Artificial Insemination of Mice
Published on: April 28, 2007
Machine learning to further improve the decision which boar ejaculates to process into artificial insemination doses
Claudia Kamphuis1, Pascal Duenk1, Roel Franciscus Veerkamp1
1Wageningen University & Research, Animal Breeding and Genomics, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Improving boar fertility assessment using advanced data analysis did not enhance artificial insemination (AI) dose quality. However, new predictive parameters for boar ejaculate fertility were identified beyond current computer assisted semen analysis (CASA) methods.
Area of Science:
- Animal Science
- Reproductive Biology
- Data Science in Agriculture
Background:
- Current artificial insemination (AI) practices rely on limited computer assisted semen analysis (CASA) parameters for boar ejaculate selection, leading to variable fertility outcomes.
- Existing AI protocols may not fully capture the complex factors influencing boar fertility, necessitating improved predictive models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if incorporating additional data sources with machine learning models can improve the prediction of boar ejaculate fertility.
- To identify novel parameters beyond standard CASA metrics that influence fertility outcomes in AI doses.
Main Methods:
- Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) models were developed to predict eight fertility phenotypes (gestation length, total born, born alive, stillborn) using data from CASA, boar ejaculate characteristics, breeding values, and weather.
- Data were divided into training, validation, and independent test sets for robust model evaluation.
- Seven prediction sets were created, incrementally adding data sources to assess their predictive power.
Main Results:
- The GBM models, even with expanded datasets, showed low predictive performance for fertility phenotypes, failing to improve upon current AI dose quality checks.
- The hypothesis that additional data and GBM models would enhance AI dose selection was rejected.
- Several parameters not currently used in routine AI processing, including CASA, breeding value, and weather-related factors, were identified as potentially significant predictors of boar fertility.
Conclusions:
- The study did not validate the hypothesis that increased data and GBM models improve AI dose quality assessment.
- Current AI laboratory practices for boar ejaculate selection may not be significantly enhanced by the tested data-driven approach.
- Identified novel parameters warrant further investigation for their potential to refine boar ejaculate quality assessment in AI.
More Related Videos
05:36Author Spotlight: Inducing Pseudopregnancy in Female Mice Without the Need for Vasectomized Males Prior to Non-Surgical Embryo Transfer or Artificial Insemination
Published on: July 7, 2023
08:56Author Spotlight: Automated Infusion and Blood Sampling for Precise Hormonal Analysis in Conscious Mice
Published on: August 25, 2023