Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 31, 2025

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Published on: May 19, 2022
Definition of high-risk prostate cancer impacts oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy
Sophie Knipper1, Pierre I Karakiewicz2, Alexander Heinze3
1Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Background:
To examine the impact of different pretreatment definitions on biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival, metastasis-free survival, and cancer-specific survival after radical prostatectomy.
Methods:
Overall, 26,364 patients with clinically localized disease who underwent radical prostatectomy at a single institution (1992-2017) were retrospectively analyzed. Seven pretreatment definitions of high-risk CaP (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥20 ng/ml, clinical stage ≥T2c, clinical stage T3 [cT3], biopsy Gleason score [GS] 8-10 [Grade Group {GG} IV-V], biopsy GS 9 to 10 [GG V], D'Amico risk definition, National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk definition) were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier, as well as multivariable Cox regression analyses were used.
Results:
Depending on the definition, patients with high-risk CaP comprised between 0.9% (cT3) and 20.3% (D'Amico high-risk) of the population. Ten-year BCR-free survival rates varied from 36.0% (≥cT2c) to 47.4% (National Comprehensive Cancer Network high-risk). Ten-year metastasis-free survival rates varied from 56.6% (GS 9-10/GG V) to 77.5% (PSA ≥ 20 ng/ml). Ten-year cancer-specific survival rates varied from 86.6% (cT3) to 94.5% (PSA ≥ 20 ng/ml). In multivariable analysis, all high-risk definitions were associated with significantly higher risk of BCR (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.4-3.9), metastatic progression (HR: 3.9-8.8), and cancer-specific mortality (HR: 2.8-11.2).
Conclusions:
Variety in outcomes exists, depending on the pretreatment definition of high-risk CaP. Among the tested, GS 9 to 10 (GG V), cT2c, and cT3 were the strongest predictor for higher BCR risk, cT3 was the strongest predictor for higher metastatic progression risk and GS 9 to 10 (GG V) was the strongest predictor for higher cancer-specific mortality risk in multivariable analyses.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Cancer-Critical Genes I: Proto-oncogenes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...

