Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 31, 2025
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
Published on: August 4, 2023
Connecting the Dots on the Origins of Social Knowledge
1Department of Psychology, Stanford University.
Insights
Infants may rapidly build social knowledge by interacting with caregivers, rather than solely relying on innate understanding. This challenges the idea that early social preferences stem from unlearned concepts of "good" and "bad."
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Cognitive Science
- Social Cognition
Background:
- Infants show preferences for "helpers" over "hinderers" and "similar" over "dissimilar" others.
- These preferences are often interpreted as evidence of innate social knowledge.
- This perspective suggests infants possess early understanding of morality and group identity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To re-examine existing research on infant social preferences.
- To propose an alternative explanation for observed infant social behaviors.
- To explore the role of caregiver relationships in shaping infant social knowledge.
Main Methods:
- Review of decades of developmental psychology research.
- Analysis of classic and contemporary findings on infant social cognition.
- Theoretical integration of observational data and established psychological theories.
Main Results:
- Infant preferences for helpers and similar others may not solely stem from innate knowledge.
- These preferences can be explained as rapidly acquired social knowledge.
- Social learning through caregiver interactions is a plausible mechanism.
Conclusions:
- Infant social knowledge is likely built through active engagement with their social environment.
- The origins of social knowledge in infancy are more dynamic than previously assumed.
- Future research should investigate the developmental trajectory of social learning in infants.
Abstract:
Understanding what infants know about social life is a growing enterprise. Indeed, one of the most exciting developments within psychological science over the past decade is the view that infants may come equipped with knowledge about "good" and "bad" and about "us" and "them." At the heart of this view is a seminal set of studies indicating that infants prefer helpers to hinderers and similar to dissimilar others. What a growing number of researchers now believe is that these preferences may be based on innate (i.e., unlearned) social knowledge. In this article, I consider how decades of research in developmental psychology can lead to a different way to make sense of this popular body of work. As I make connections between old observations and new theorizing-and between classic findings and contemporary research-I consider how the same preferences that are thought to emanate from innate social knowledge may instead reflect social knowledge that infants can rapidly build as they pursue relationships with their caregivers. I offer this perspective with hopes that it will inspire future work that supports or questions the ideas sketched out here and, by doing so, will broaden an understanding of the origins of social knowledge.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
02:57The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
01:30Scientific Nature of Social Psychology
01:20Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
01:15Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes
01:24Social Foundations of Self I: Play and Game
02:16Self-Schemas