Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 31, 2025

Simple and Rapid Method to Obtain High-quality Tumor DNA from Clinical-pathological Specimens Using Touch Imprint Cytology
Published on: March 21, 2018
[Molecular diagnostics of cytological specimens]
Jana Fassunke1, Markus Ball2, Marianne Engels2
1Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50924, Köln, Deutschland. Jana.fassunke@uk-koeln.de.
Cytological preparations can be used for molecular testing in lung cancer when biopsy samples are insufficient. This approach enables comprehensive diagnostics, including next-generation sequencing (NGS) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses, even with limited material, avoiding repeat biopsies.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Pathology
- Oncology
- Cytopathology
Background:
- Targeted therapies for lung carcinomas with specific genetic alterations (ALK, BRAF, EGFR) require molecular pathological testing.
- Biopsy samples often yield insufficient tumor content for molecular analyses like PCR-based examinations or FISH.
- Limited sample material poses a challenge for comprehensive molecular diagnostics in lung cancer.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the utility of cytological preparations for molecular genetic testing in lung cancer.
- To determine the success rates of NGS and FISH analyses on cytological samples.
- To establish comprehensive diagnostics for lung cancer using limited starting material and avoid re-biopsies.
Main Methods:
- Cytological preparations (e.g., brush smears, needle aspirates, effusions) were utilized after morphological analysis and confirmatory diagnosis.
- Cytopathologists identified and marked tumor cell areas for DNA extraction or FISH analysis.
- Stained sections were destained prior to hybridization for FISH analysis; NGS and FISH were performed on these preparations.
Main Results:
- A total of 1711 next-generation sequencing (NGS) and FISH analyses were performed on cytological preparations between 2016 and July 2019.
- The success rate for NGS examinations was 85.9%.
- The success rate for FISH analyses was 82.8%.
Conclusions:
- Cytological preparations are a viable alternative for molecular testing when biopsy material is limited.
- This method allows for comprehensive molecular diagnostics, including NGS and FISH, thereby avoiding the need for re-biopsies.
- Successful molecular profiling can be achieved even with small sample sizes, facilitating targeted therapy decisions.
More Related Videos
08:08qPCR Is a Sensitive and Rapid Method for Detection of Cytomegaloviral DNA in Formalin-fixed, Paraffin-embedded Biopsy Tissue
Published on: July 9, 2014
09:05Methylation Specific Multiplex Droplet PCR using Polymer Droplet Generator Device for Hematological Diagnostics
Published on: June 29, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Karyotyping
Modern Molecular Taxonomy
Applications of Molecular Taxonomy
Methods of Classification and Identification