[Community pharmacists, students in pharmacy, and requests of codeine-based medicines: Observational study]

The case of purple drank motivated a study to investigate the way community pharmacists and students in pharmacy managed, with patients, the abuse risk of non-prescription codeine-based medicines.

This prospective descriptive study was conducted, between September and October 2016, within a 170 community pharmacies network of Aquitaine and 437 pharmacy students of Bordeaux university (fourth, fifth and sixth year students, without selection of the pharmacies where they were able to work). It used a common survey questionnaire, which was sent to students through their own "Facebook" (Facebook Inc.) groups.

Pharmacists advised codeine-based medicines in self-medication mostly as a second line pain treatment (96.2%), students also (72.1%). The opinions of pharmacists were almost equally shared concerning their ability to identify dependent patients or to raise the subject of addiction with them (57.7% and 53.8% of positive responses). This seemed to be more difficult for students (57.4% doubted about their ability of identification, 73.8% felt unable to address this issue with patients). Successful experiences concerning help to pharmacodependent patients were rare (11.5% of pharmacist, 4.9% of students). All were involved in patient information on these medicines use. Their opinions about an evolution toward a mandatory prescription status for all codeine-based medicines were almost equally split: 50% of pharmacists were favourable to it, 44.3% of students. They expressed the need for information tools in the care of these patients (46.2% of community pharmacists, 63.9% of students).

These results illustrated the interest of pharmacists, and students in pharmacy, toward pharmacodependent patients; they also showed the complexity of this relation. Thus, they could help the elaboration of information tools in the care of these patients, with an adaptation for students who nevertheless presented a good maturity about this question.