Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Utilizing 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging and Quantitative Histology to Measure Dynamic Changes in the Glucose Metabolism in Mouse Models of Lung Cancer
Published on: July 21, 2018
Qualitative and quantitative reproducibility of [18]fluoromethycholine PET/computed tomography in prostate cancer
Thomas Pinto-Leite1, Florent Tixier1, Taman Upadhaya1
1Nuclear Medicine Department.
Background:
Recurrence occurs in more than 50% of prostate cancer. To be effective, treatments require precise localization of tumor cells. [F]fluoromethylcholine ([18F]FCH) PET/computed tomography (CT) is currently used to restage disease in cases of biochemical relapse. To be used for therapy response as has been suggested, repeatability limits of PET derived indices need to be established.
Objective:
The aim of our study was to prospectively assess the qualitative and quantitative reproducibility [18F]FCH PET/CT in prostate cancer.
Methods:
Patients with histologically proven prostate cancer referred for initial staging or restaging were prospectively included. All patients underwent two [18F]FCH PET/CTs in the same conditions within a maximum of 3 weeks' time. We studied the repeatability of the visual report and the repeatability of SUVmax and its evolution over the acquisition time in lesions, liver and vascular background. Statistical analysis was performed using the Bland-Altman approach.
Results:
Twenty-one patients were included. Reporting repeatability was excellent with 97.8% of concordance. Mean repeatability of SUVmax considering all times and all lesions was 2.2% ± 20. Evolution of SUVmax was unpredictable, either increasing or decreasing over the acquisition time, both for lesions and for physiological activity.
Conclusion:
Our study demonstrated that visual report of [18F]FCH PET/CT was very reproducible and that the repeatability limits of SUVmax was similar to those of other PET radiotracers. An SUVmax difference of more than 40% should be considered as representing a treatment response effect. Change of SUVmax during the acquisition time varied and should not be considered as an interpretation criterion.
More Related Videos
06:54MR Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer with a Small Molecular CLT1 Peptide Targeted Contrast Agent
Published on: September 3, 2013
08:02Author Spotlight: Enhanced Quantification of Cardiovascular Calcification Progression for Longitudinal Micro PET/CT Studies in Small Research Animals
Published on: November 15, 2024