Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

Establishment and Characterization of UTI and CAUTI in a Mouse Model
Published on: June 23, 2015
d-Mannose Treatment neither Affects Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Properties nor Induces Stable FimH Modifications
Daniela Scribano1,2, Meysam Sarshar3,4, Carla Prezioso1
1Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Abstract:
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are mainly caused by uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC). Acute and recurrent UTIs are commonly treated with antibiotics, the efficacy of which is limited by the emergence of antibiotic resistant strains. The natural sugar d-mannose is considered as an alternative to antibiotics due to its ability to mask the bacterial adhesin FimH, thereby preventing its binding to urothelial cells. Despite its extensive use, the possibility that d-mannose exerts "antibiotic-like" activity by altering bacterial growth and metabolism or selecting FimH variants has not been investigated yet. To this aim, main bacterial features of the prototype UPEC strain CFT073 treated with d-mannose were analyzed by standard microbiological methods. FimH functionality was analyzed by yeast agglutination and human bladder cell adhesion assays. Our results indicate that high d-mannose concentrations have no effect on bacterial growth and do not interfere with the activity of different antibiotics. d-mannose ranked as the least preferred carbon source to support bacterial metabolism and growth, in comparison with d-glucose, d-fructose, and l-arabinose. Since small glucose amounts are physiologically detectable in urine, we can conclude that the presence of d-mannose is irrelevant for bacterial metabolism. Moreover, d-mannose removal after long-term exposure did not alter FimH's capacity to bind to mannosylated proteins. Overall, our data indicate that d-mannose is a good alternative in the prevention and treatment of UPEC-related UTIs.
Insights
D-mannose effectively prevents uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) from adhering to the urinary tract without impacting bacterial growth or antibiotic effectiveness, making it a safe alternative treatment.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are frequently caused by uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC).
- Antibiotic resistance limits the effectiveness of current UTI treatments.
- D-mannose is explored as an antibiotic alternative due to its ability to inhibit bacterial adhesion.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if d-mannose exhibits "antibiotic-like" activity by altering UPEC growth, metabolism, or FimH variants.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of d-mannose as a UTI treatment alternative.
Main Methods:
- Standard microbiological methods were used to analyze UPEC strain CFT073 treated with d-mannose.
- FimH functionality was assessed through yeast agglutination and human bladder cell adhesion assays.
- Bacterial growth and metabolism were compared across different carbon sources.
Main Results:
- High d-mannose concentrations did not affect UPEC growth or antibiotic efficacy.
- D-mannose was a less preferred carbon source for bacterial metabolism compared to glucose, fructose, and arabinose.
- D-mannose exposure did not alter FimH binding capacity after removal.
Conclusions:
- D-mannose does not possess "antibiotic-like" properties concerning bacterial growth or metabolism.
- D-mannose is a viable alternative for preventing and treating UPEC-related UTIs without adverse effects on bacteria.
- Its mechanism is solely based on preventing bacterial adhesion, not on inhibiting growth or altering bacterial genetics.
More Related Videos
07:34Isolation of Single Intracellular Bacterial Communities Generated from a Murine Model of Urinary Tract Infection for Downstream Single-cell Analysis
Published on: April 16, 2019
08:53Recurrent Escherichia coli Urinary Tract Infection Triggered by Gardnerella vaginalis Bladder Exposure in Mice
Published on: December 4, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Inhibitors of Bacterial DNA Synthesis
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance