Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

397
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
397
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.6K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.6K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

9.1K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
9.1K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.2K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.2K
Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter01:26

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

5.0K
The accurate values of population parameters such as population proportion, population mean, and population standard deviation (or variance) are usually unknown. These are fixed values that can only be estimated from the data collected from the samples. The estimates of each of these parameters are sample proportion, the sample mean, and sample standard deviation (or variance). To obtain the values of these sample statistics, data are required that have particular distribution and central...
5.0K
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

3.0K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
3.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Robust discovery of mutational signatures using power posteriors.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Sequential Gibbs posteriors with applications to principal component analysis.

Biometrika·2026
Same author

Scalable and robust regression models for continuous proportional data.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026
Same author

Local graph estimation with pathwise false discovery control.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Bayesian Transfer Learning.

Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics·2026
Same author

Domain Adaptive Bootstrap Aggregating.

IEEE transactions on signal processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society·2026
Same journal

Instrumental Variable Estimation of Marginal Structural Mean Models for Time-Varying Treatment.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026
Same journal

Semiparametric Joint Modeling for Survival Analysis with Longitudinal Covariates.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026
Same journal

Dimension Reduction for Large-Scale Federated Data: Statistical Rate and Asymptotic Inference.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026
Same journal

Facilitating Heterogeneous Effect Estimation via Statistically Efficient Categorical Modifiers.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026
Same journal

Nonparametric Density Estimation of a Long-Term Trend from Repeated Semicontinuous Data.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026
Same journal

Functional Integrative Bayesian Analysis of High-dimensional Multiplatform Clinicogenomic Data.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 30, 2025

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types
12:39

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

Published on: December 10, 2012

11.6K

Robust Bayesian inference via coarsening.

Jeffrey W Miller1, David B Dunson2

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Harvard University.

Journal of the American Statistical Association
|January 17, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a robust Bayesian inference method that improves reliability when data slightly deviates from the assumed model. The approach enhances model accuracy by tempering the likelihood function for better results.

Keywords:
Model errorclusteringmodel misspecificationpower likelihoodrelative entropytempering

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.9K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in X-ray CT Tool Chain for Tree Core Analysis
06:56

Author Spotlight: Advancements in X-ray CT Tool Chain for Tree Core Analysis

Published on: September 22, 2023

1.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 30, 2025

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types
12:39

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

Published on: December 10, 2012

11.6K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.9K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in X-ray CT Tool Chain for Tree Core Analysis
06:56

Author Spotlight: Advancements in X-ray CT Tool Chain for Tree Core Analysis

Published on: September 22, 2023

1.5K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Computational Statistics

Background:

  • Standard Bayesian inference assumes data perfectly fits the model, but minor deviations can significantly skew results.
  • Robustness in statistical modeling is crucial for reliable inference when model assumptions are imperfectly met.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel Bayesian inference approach enhancing robustness against small model departures.
  • To provide a method that maintains reliable outcomes even when data distributions slightly deviate from the chosen model.

Main Methods:

  • Introduced a new Bayesian inference technique by conditioning on model-generated data being 'close' to observed data, using relative entropy for closeness.
  • Approximated the resulting 'coarsened' posterior by tempering the likelihood function (raising to a fractional power).
  • Applied standard inference algorithms and derived analytical solutions for conjugate priors.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method demonstrates improved robustness to minor violations of the model assumption.
  • Tempering the likelihood provides a practical approximation for the robust Bayesian inference.
  • The approach yielded accurate results when tested on mixture and autoregressive models with real and simulated data.

Conclusions:

  • The novel Bayesian inference method offers enhanced reliability by addressing model misspecification.
  • Likelihood tempering is an effective technique for achieving robustness in Bayesian analysis.
  • This approach is broadly applicable across various statistical models and data types.