Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
Published on: September 16, 2025
Repeatability and agreement of intraocular pressure measurement among three tonometers
Irene Sánchez Pavón1,2,3, Pilar Cañadas1,2,4, Raúl Martin1,2,3,5
1Departamento de Física Teórica, Atómica y Óptica, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Background:
Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) is one of the causes of irreversible optic nerve head damage and visual field loss. It is often measured with applanation tonometers but the use of rebound tonometry devices has been proposed as an alternative to assess IOP. Rebound tonometers have also been proposed as a method for patients to measure their own intraocular pressure (that is, self-tonometry). The purpose of this study was to determine the intrasession repeatability and the agreement of the IOP measurement with two rebound measuring principle tonometers, ICare ic100 and ICare Home with Perkins tonometer.
Methods:
This study involved 27 healthy volunteers (18 to 30 years old). We performed three consecutive IOP measurements with ICare Home, ICare ic100, and Perkins. The means of the three measurements from each device were calculated. Repeatability and agreement were defined according to the British Standards Institute and the International Organization for Standardization. The agreement was assessed using the method described by Bland and Altman, where 95 per cent of the differences or limits of agreement were between 1.96 standard deviations of the mean difference.
Results:
All tonometers showed close measurements (Perkins 15.34 ± 3.45 mmHg, range 10.00-24.00; ICare ic100 15.40 ± 4.06 mmHg, range 9.67-23.33; and ICare Home 14.22 ± 4.72 mmHg, range 7.33-24.00). The co-efficient of variation (CV) and within-subject standard deviation (Sw) was low for ICare ic100 and Perkins (close to 6.30 per cent and one) with higher values for ICare Home (CV = 9.55% and Sw = 1.33). The intraclass correlation co-efficient showed values higher than 0.96 for all tonometers. The difference between both rebound tonometers was statistically significant (p = 0.03).
Conclusion:
The ICare ic100 tonometer provides repeatable IOP measurements close to the measurements of the Perkins IOP (good agreement); however, ICare Home provides less repeatable values, showing worse agreement with the Perkins tonometer in healthy subjects.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.

