Prognostication of Poor Survival After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Paulius Bašinskas1, Neris Stoškutė1,2, Austėja Gerulytė1
1Department of Cardiology, Medical Academy, Faculty of Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 50009 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Insights
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can fail in one-third of patients. Ischemic heart failure and reduced tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) are significant predictors of worse survival after CRT implantation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a key treatment for heart failure (HF).
- A significant portion of patients (approximately one-third) do not benefit from CRT or experience adverse outcomes.
- Identifying preimplantation factors predicting CRT outcomes is crucial for patient selection and management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate preimplantation clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic factors associated with survival after CRT.
- To identify predictors of poor outcomes in patients undergoing CRT.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective unicenter study of 183 consecutive patients receiving CRT.
- Analysis of baseline demographic, clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic data.
- Multivariate and univariate Cox regression analyses were used to assess survival predictors.
Main Results:
- The study found that an ischemic origin of heart failure (HF) was a significant predictor of worse survival (aHR 15.235, p=0.009).
- Reduced tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) <15.5 mm was associated with adverse outcomes (HR 5.019, p=0.012).
- Post-implantation use of antiplatelet agents, statins, and nitrates also showed associations with poorer survival.
Conclusions:
- Ischemic etiology of heart failure is a significant factor linked to worse survival post-CRT.
- Decreased TAPSE is also identified as a predictor of poor survival in CRT recipients.
- These findings may aid in refining patient selection and post-CRT management strategies.
Abstract:
Background and Objectives: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a successful treatment option for appropriately selected patients. However, one-third of recipients do not experience any positive outcome or their condition even declines. We aimed to assess preimplantation factors associated with worse survival after the CRT. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective unicenter trial. The study cohort included 183 consecutive CRT-treated patients. Baseline demographic, clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic characteristics were analyzed. Results: After the median follow-up of 15.6 months (9.3-26.3), 20 patients had died (11%). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, ischemic origin of heart failure (HF) was a significant predictor of poor survival (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 15.235, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.999-116.1), p = 0.009). In univariate Cox regression, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) <15.5 mm (sensitivity 0.824, specificity 0.526; HR 5.019, 95% CI (1.436-17.539), p = 0.012), post-implantation prescribed antiplatelet agents (HR 2.569, 95% CI (1.060-6.226), p = 0.037), statins (HR 2.983, 95% CI (1.146-7.764), p = 0.025), and nitrates (HR 3.694, 95% CI (1.342-10.171), p = 0.011) appeared to be related with adverse outcome. Conclusions: ischemic etiology of HF is a significant factor associated with worse survival after the CRT. Decreased TAPSE is also related to poor survival.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy


