Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 30, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Temporal Trends in Critical Care Outcomes in U.S. Minority-Serving Hospitals
John Danziger1, Miguel Ángel Armengol de la Hoz2,3,4, Wenyuan Li5
1Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Insights
Critical care improvements over a decade did not benefit all hospitals equally. Minority-serving hospitals showed slower progress in reducing mortality and length of stay for critically ill patients, especially African Americans.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Health Services Research
- Health Equity
Background:
- Critical care medicine has seen significant advancements over the past decade.
- It remains unclear if these improvements have been uniformly distributed across all hospital types.
- Disparities in healthcare outcomes may persist, particularly in hospitals serving minority populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate temporal trends in critical care outcomes.
- To compare outcomes between minority-serving and non-minority-serving hospitals.
- To assess if critical care improvements have reached all patient populations.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the Philips Health Care electronic ICU Research Institute Database.
- Identified minority-serving hospitals based on African American or Hispanic ICU census.
- Analyzed data from nearly 1.1 million critical illness admissions across 208 ICUs (2006-2016).
- Examined adjusted hospital mortality and length of hospitalization as primary outcomes.
Main Results:
- Minority-serving hospitals cared for a disproportionately high number of African American (25%) and Hispanic (48%) patients.
- While non-minority-serving hospitals saw a 2% annual decrease in mortality, minority-serving hospitals showed no comparable improvement.
- African American patients in minority-serving hospitals experienced no significant reduction in mortality over time, unlike those in non-minority-serving hospitals.
- Length of stay also decreased in non-minority-serving hospitals but showed minimal change for African Americans in minority-serving facilities.
Conclusions:
- Critically ill African American patients are predominantly treated in minority-serving hospitals.
- These hospitals have demonstrated significantly less improvement in critical care outcomes over the past decade compared to non-minority-serving institutions.
- This highlights a critical gap in healthcare equity within intensive care.
Abstract:
Rationale: Whether critical care improvements over the last 10 years extend to all hospitals has not been described.Objectives: To examine the temporal trends of critical care outcomes in minority and non-minority-serving hospitals using an inception cohort of critically ill patients.Measurements and Main Results: Using the Philips Health Care electronic ICU Research Institute Database, we identified minority-serving hospitals as those with an African American or Hispanic ICU census more than twice its regional mean. We examined almost 1.1 million critical illness admissions among 208 ICUs from across the United States admitted between 2006 and 2016. Adjusted hospital mortality (primary) and length of hospitalization (secondary) were the main outcomes. Large pluralities of African American (25%, n = 27,242) and Hispanic individuals (48%, n = 26,743) were cared for in minority-serving hospitals, compared with only 5.2% (n = 42,941) of white individuals. Over the last 10 years, although the risk of critical illness mortality steadily decreased by 2% per year (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-0.98) in non-minority-serving hospitals, outcomes within minority-serving hospitals did not improve comparably. This disparity in temporal trends was particularly noticeable among African American individuals, where each additional calendar year was associated with a 3% (95% CI, 0.96-0.97) lower adjusted critical illness mortality within a non-minority-serving hospital, but no change within minority-serving hospitals (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97-1.01). Similarly, although ICU and hospital lengths of stay decreased by 0.08 (95% CI, -0.08 to -0.07) and 0.16 (95% CI, -0.16 to -0.15) days per additional calendar year, respectively, in non-minority-serving hospitals, there was little temporal change for African American individuals in minority-serving hospitals.Conclusions: Critically ill African American individuals are disproportionately cared for in minority-serving hospitals, which have shown significantly less improvement than non-minority-serving hospitals over the last 10 years.
More Related Videos
09:55Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
Published on: September 28, 2022
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Standards of Care I
Current Trends in Nursing I
Current Trends in Nursing II
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...