Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Laparoscopic Non-Mesh Cerclage Pectopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Published on: September 13, 2022
Cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth in singletons and twin pregnancies: an update systematic review and
Yi-Quan Xiong1, Jing Tan1, Yan-Mei Liu1
1Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre and CREAT Group, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Insights
The effectiveness of cervical pessary in preventing preterm birth (PTB) remains uncertain for both singleton and twin pregnancies. While it may reduce spontaneous PTB and low birth weight in twins, more research is needed.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine
- Perinatal Research
Background:
- Preterm birth (PTB) is a significant cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity.
- Cervical pessaries are devices used to support the cervix, potentially preventing PTB.
- Evidence on the effectiveness of cervical pessaries, particularly in diverse pregnancy types, requires synthesis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically evaluate the efficacy of cervical pessary use in preventing PTB.
- To assess the impact of cervical pessary on perinatal outcomes in singleton and twin pregnancies.
- To compare cervical pessary intervention against expectant management strategies.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were conducted.
- Studies were searched from inception until March 14, 2019, across electronic databases.
- The primary outcome measure was the incidence of PTB before 34 weeks gestation.
Main Results:
- Thirteen studies (8 singleton, 6 twin pregnancies) were included.
- Cervical pessaries showed no significant effectiveness in preventing PTB at various gestational ages (<28, <34, <37 weeks) for singleton pregnancies with short cervix.
- For twin pregnancies with short cervix, cervical pessaries did not reduce PTB rates but showed potential to decrease spontaneous PTB before 28 weeks and low birth weight (<1500g). Vaginal discharge increased, and overall perinatal outcomes did not improve.
Conclusions:
- The effectiveness of cervical pessary in reducing PTB risk compared to expectant management is currently uncertain.
- Further high-quality randomized controlled trials are necessary to definitively establish the role of cervical pessaries.
- Cervical pessaries may offer specific benefits for certain subgroups, such as reducing spontaneous PTB in twin pregnancies, warranting further investigation.
Objectives:
To evaluate the effectiveness of cervical pessary in preventing preterm birth (PTB) and improving perinatal outcomes among singleton and twin pregnancies.
Methods:
Electronic databases were systematically searched from their inception until 14 March 2019. Randomized clinical trials comparing the effectiveness of cervical pessary placement with expectant management were included. The primary outcome was the incidence of PTB <34 weeks.
Results:
Thirteen studies were included, involving eight studies about singleton and six studies about twin pregnancies. For singleton pregnancies with short cervical length, cervical pessary, comparing with expectant treatment, seemed have no effectiveness in preventing PTB <34 weeks (relative risk, 95% confidence interval, 0.73, 0.42-1.28), <37 weeks (0.69, 0.43-1.09), and <28 weeks (0.79, 0.42-1.48); while for twin pregnancies with short cervical length, cervical pessary also did not reduce the risk of PTB <34 weeks (0.81, 0.49-1.35), <37 weeks (0.93, 0.83-1.05), and <28 weeks (0.72, 0.38-1.38). However, cervical pessary seemed have the effectiveness of reducing the risk of spontaneous PTB <28 weeks (0.50, 0.25-0.99) and low birth weight (<1500 g) (0.68, 0.50-0.94) among twin pregnancies with short cervical length. In addition, cervical pessary increased the rate of vaginal discharge and did not improve perinatal outcomes among both singleton and twin pregnancies.
Conclusions:
Comparing with the expectant treatment, the effectiveness of cervical pessary for reducing the risk of PTB remains uncertain. Additional trials are warranted to further evaluate the effectiveness of cervical pessary.
More Related Videos
03:30Author Spotlight: Advancing Pelvic Prolapse Treatment with a Non-Mesh Approach using Laparoscopic Pectopexy
Published on: October 25, 2024
09:51Model Surgical Training: Skills Acquisition in Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation of Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Placenta Using Realistic Simulators
Published on: March 21, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Birth Control Methods
Mitral Valve Prolapse III: Nursing Management