'Jump start' childcare-based intervention to promote physical activity in pre-schoolers: six-month findings from a

Anthony D Okely1, Rebecca M Stanley2, Rachel A Jones2

  • 1Early Start, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave, Wollongong, New South Wales, 2522, Australia. tokely@uow.edu.au.

Insights

The Jump Start intervention did not increase physical activity in young children after six months. Low implementation fidelity was a key factor, suggesting improved adherence may yield better results at 18 months.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Pediatrics
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • Early childhood physical activity is crucial for long-term health and development.
  • Low-income communities face unique challenges in promoting physical activity in early years.
  • The study investigates a multicomponent intervention in early childhood education and care (ECEC) settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the 6-month impact of the Jump Start intervention on physical activity levels in preschool children.
  • To assess the intervention's effectiveness in low-income communities within Australia.
  • To identify potential moderators of intervention effects on physical activity.

Main Methods:

  • A cluster randomised controlled trial involving 43 ECEC settings in disadvantaged areas.
  • Recruitment and assessment of 3-year-old children using Actigraph accelerometers over 6 months.
  • Intention-to-treat analysis guided by Social Cognitive Theory with five intervention components.

Main Results:

  • No significant intervention effect on minutes per hour of physical activity was observed (adjusted difference = -0.17 mins/hr).
  • Intervention component implementation ranged from 38% to 72%, indicating suboptimal adherence.
  • A potential positive effect was noted in overweight/obese children in the control group compared to the intervention group.

Conclusions:

  • The Jump Start intervention showed no significant effect on physical activity levels at the 6-month follow-up.
  • Low implementation fidelity is a primary reason for the lack of observed intervention effects.
  • Improved implementation fidelity is hypothesized to lead to greater physical activity gains at the 18-month assessment.
Abstract