How well has self-exclusion worked?

H A Perkins1, S Samson, M P Busch

  • 1Irwin Memorial Blood Bank, San Francisco, California 94118.

Transfusion
|November 1, 1988
PubMed

Insights

Most individuals who later developed AIDS stopped donating blood by 1983. This indicates that self-exclusion policies effectively reduced blood donations from at-risk populations, enhancing blood supply safety.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Infectious Disease Control

Background:

  • The emergence of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) raised significant concerns regarding blood transfusion safety.
  • Identifying and excluding infectious agents from the blood supply is crucial for public health.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of self-exclusion policies in preventing blood donations from individuals at risk of transmitting AIDS.
  • To analyze donation patterns of individuals later diagnosed with AIDS.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of blood donation records.
  • Analysis of donation cessation dates for individuals who subsequently developed AIDS.

Main Results:

  • A significant majority of individuals who were later diagnosed with AIDS ceased donating blood in 1983.
  • This cessation predates widespread public awareness campaigns and widespread implementation of more stringent screening.

Conclusions:

  • Self-exclusion policies, even in their early stages, demonstrated considerable effectiveness in reducing donations from at-risk individuals.
  • These findings support the importance of donor self-reporting and exclusion in safeguarding the blood supply against transfusion-transmissible infections.

Related Concept Videos

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping02:05

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about the way you...
The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies02:09

Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies

When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
Self-Serving Bias01:29

Self-Serving Bias

Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...