Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Testing the Efficacy of Pharmacological Agents in a Pericardial Target Delivery Model in the Swine
Published on: July 7, 2016
Device Therapy for Sudden Cardiac Death Prophylaxis After Acute Coronary Syndrome: When and Why?
Faheemullah Beg1, Miguel Valderrabano2, Paul Schurmann3
1Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist Debakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Insights
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) effectively prevent sudden cardiac death in select patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Recent trials clarify indications for both primary and secondary prevention, establishing ICDs as crucial for high-risk individuals.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are vital for preventing sudden cardiac death (SCD) in ischemic cardiomyopathy.
- Indications and optimal timing for ICDs in acute coronary syndromes remain areas of investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review clinical trials defining the indications for cardiac defibrillators in patients with coronary artery disease.
- To synthesize evidence for both primary and secondary prevention of SCD.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of key clinical trials including AVID, CIDS, CASH, MADIT, CABG Patch, MUSTT, MADIT-II, DINAMIT, IRIS, and VEST.
- Analysis of trial outcomes regarding all-cause mortality, arrhythmic death, and patient subgroups.
Main Results:
- Secondary prevention trials (AVID, CIDS, CASH) demonstrate reduced mortality and arrhythmic death.
- Primary prevention trials (MADIT, MADIT-II, etc.) refined indications, showing greatest benefit in patients with reduced ejection fraction and specific post-myocardial infarction or revascularization timelines.
- The VEST trial found wearable cardioverter-defibrillators (WCDs) did not reduce arrhythmic deaths in patients without ICD indications.
Conclusions:
- Cardiac defibrillators are effective in carefully selected patients for preventing sudden cardiac death.
- Evidence consistently supports defibrillator use in both primary and secondary prevention settings for appropriate patient groups.
Abstract:
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are a powerful tool in preventing sudden cardiac death due to ventricular arrhythmias in ischemic cardiomyopathy. ICD indications and timing in acute coronary syndromes are unclear. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We reviewed several trials that delineated the indications for a cardiac defibrillator in patients with coronary artery disease. RECENT FINDINGS: The role of cardiac defibrillators in secondary prevention has been well established by AVID, CIDS, and CASH trials. AVID showed reduction in both all-cause mortality and arrhythmic death while the two smaller trials showed only improvement in arrhythmic death. Similarly, trials like MADIT, CABG Patch, MUSTT, MADIT-II, DINAMIT, and the IRIS trial have fine-tuned the indications for ICD in primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. Benefits of an ICD were most pronounced in those with reduced ejection fraction and 40 days or more since myocardial infarction or in those who were not immediately post revascularization. The recent VEST trial aimed to study wearable cardioverter-defibrillators (WCDs) in patients who did not have an indication for an implantable defibrillator. The arrhythmic deaths (1.6% vs. 2.4%) were not reduced by the WCD. Based on consistent reduction in arrhythmic death in all primary and secondary prevention trials, defibrillators are effective in carefully selected patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use

