Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

How Data are Classified: Categorical Data01:11

How Data are Classified: Categorical Data

42.2K
A variable, usually notated by capital letters such as X and Y, is a characteristic or measurement that can be determined for each member of a population. Data are the actual values of variables. They may be numbers, or they may be words. Datum is a single value.
Data are classified based on whether they are measurable or not. Categorical data cannot be measured; instead, it can be divided into categories. For example, if Y denotes a person's party affiliation, some examples of Y include...
42.2K
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

6.8K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
6.8K
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.4K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.4K
How Data are Classified: Numerical Data00:59

How Data are Classified: Numerical Data

36.3K
Data that are countable or measurable in specific units are called numerical or quantitative data. Quantitative data are always numbers. Quantitative data are the result of counting or measuring the attributes of a population. Amount of money, pulse rate, weight, number of people living in a town, and number of students who opt for statistics are examples of quantitative data.
Quantitative data may be either discrete or continuous. All quantitative data that take on only specific numerical...
36.3K
Classification of Titrimetric Analysis Based on Reaction Types01:01

Classification of Titrimetric Analysis Based on Reaction Types

1.5K
Titrimetric analysis in solution chemistry involves measuring the volume of solutions and is often called volumetric analysis. The standard solution of known concentration in the burette is called the titrant, whereas the solution of unknown concentration in the flask is called the analyte, or titrand. Titrimetric analyses can be classified into four types based on the reactions between the titrant and analyte.
Titrations between an acid and a base lead to neutralization reactions that form...
1.5K
Classification of Signals01:30

Classification of Signals

1.3K
In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
1.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Instance-dependent Early Stopping for Adaptive Data Pruning.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same author

Class-Distribution-Aware Pseudo-Labeling for Semi-Supervised Multi-Label Learning.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same author

Creating a general-purpose generative model for healthcare data based on multiple clinical studies.

PLOS digital health·2025
Same author

Impact of Noisy Supervision in Foundation Model Learning.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2025
Same author

Deep generative abnormal lesion emphasization validated by nine radiologists and 1000 chest X-rays with lung nodules.

PloS one·2024
Same author

A Fast Algorithm for the Real-Valued Combinatorial Pure Exploration of the Multi-Armed Bandit.

Neural computation·2024
Same journal

A Model-Free Reinforcement Learning Implementation of Decision Making Under Uncertainty by Sequential Sampling.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

DROP: Distributional and Regular Optimism and Pessimism for Reinforcement Learning.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

Hierarchical Active Inference Using Successor Representations.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

W-Kernel and Its Principal Space for Frequentist Evaluation of Bayesian Estimators.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

A Hidden Markov Model-Inspired Sequence Classification Method for Hyperdimensional Computing.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

Sparse Graphical Modeling for Electrophysiological Phase-Based Connectivity Using Circular Statistics.

Neural computation·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.9K

Classification from Triplet Comparison Data.

Zhenghang Cui1, Nontawat Charoenphakdee2, Issei Sato3

  • 1The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan, and RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, Tokyo 103-0027, Japan cui@ms.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

Neural Computation
|January 18, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study demonstrates that classifiers can be learned solely from triplet comparison data, offering an unbiased estimator for classification risk. This advances metric learning and ordinal embedding by enabling accurate classification without full labels.

More Related Videos

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

7.3K
Label-Free Identification of Lymphocyte Subtypes Using Three-Dimensional Quantitative Phase Imaging and Machine Learning
08:58

Label-Free Identification of Lymphocyte Subtypes Using Three-Dimensional Quantitative Phase Imaging and Machine Learning

Published on: November 19, 2018

13.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.9K
Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

7.3K
Label-Free Identification of Lymphocyte Subtypes Using Three-Dimensional Quantitative Phase Imaging and Machine Learning
08:58

Label-Free Identification of Lymphocyte Subtypes Using Three-Dimensional Quantitative Phase Imaging and Machine Learning

Published on: November 19, 2018

13.0K

Area of Science:

  • Machine Learning
  • Computer Vision

Background:

  • Triplet comparison data offers a more human-friendly alternative to fully labeled datasets for tasks like metric learning and ordinal embedding.
  • A key challenge in utilizing triplet data is learning classifiers without complete instance labels.

Discussion:

  • This research introduces an unbiased estimator for classification risk within the empirical risk minimization framework.
  • The proposed method seamlessly integrates with various surrogate loss functions and models, including neural networks.

Key Insights:

  • Successfully demonstrates the feasibility of training classifiers exclusively from triplet comparison data.
  • Establishes a theoretical estimation error bound for the proposed empirical risk minimizer, ensuring reliability.
  • Empirical results validate the method's effectiveness, outperforming existing baseline approaches.

Outlook:

  • Potential for broader applications in areas requiring efficient data labeling.
  • Further research could explore extensions to more complex data structures and learning paradigms.