The economic impact of clinically significant tricuspid regurgitation in a large, administrative claims database
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
David P Cork1, Peter A McCullough2, Hirsch S Mehta3
1Scripps Memorial Hospital, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Insights
Clinically significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) significantly increases healthcare utilization and costs, regardless of heart failure (HF). This study quantifies the substantial economic burden associated with TR, highlighting its impact on hospitalizations and expenditures.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Economics
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Heart failure (HF) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) are significant cardiovascular conditions.
- Quantifying the healthcare burden of TR, particularly in relation to HF, is crucial for resource allocation and patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the healthcare burden, including hospitalizations and expenditures, associated with clinically significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients with and without heart failure (HF).
Main Methods:
- Utilized IBM MarketScan Research Databases (October 2011-September 2016) for patients aged ≥18 with a TR diagnosis.
- Categorized patients into four cohorts based on the presence of HF and clinically significant TR.
- Analyzed all-cause hospitalizations, hospital days, and expenditures using multivariable models adjusted for demographics and comorbidities.
Main Results:
- Clinically significant TR, with or without HF, significantly increased healthcare utilization and expenditures compared to patients without significant TR.
- Patients with no HF and clinically significant TR incurred higher annual costs ($29,985) and hospitalizations (0.41) than those with no HF and no significant TR ($17,478; 0.20 hospitalizations).
- Patients with both HF and clinically significant TR faced the highest burden, with 0.59 hospitalizations and $42,255 in annual expenditures.
Conclusions:
- Clinically significant TR is independently associated with increased healthcare utilization and expenditures.
- The presence of TR exacerbates the healthcare burden, even in patients without heart failure.
- These findings underscore the substantial economic impact of TR and the need for effective management strategies.
Abstract:
Aim: This study aimed to quantify the healthcare burden of clinically significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients with and without heart failure (HF).Materials and Methods: Data were from the IBM MarketScan Research Databases from October 2011 to September 2016. Eligible patients met the following inclusion criteria: age ≥18 with a TR diagnosis, 12 months pre (baseline), and 6 months post (landmark) medical enrollment. The landmark period was used to categorize TR severity, defined as a record of pulmonary hypertension with ascites, lower extremity edema or hepatic insufficiency, or tricuspid valve surgery. Cohorts were defined based on TR etiology and severity: (1) no HF and no clinically significant TR; (2) HF with no clinically significant TR; (3) no HF with clinically significant TR; and (4) HF with clinically significant TR. Outcomes of interest were all-cause hospitalizations, hospital days, and expenditures. Multivariable models were fit for each of the annualized outcomes and adjusted for patient demographics, comorbidities, and other concomitant valve diseases.Results: There were 92,994 patients eligible for analysis. Patients with no HF and no clinically significant TR had the annualized healthcare burden of 0.20 all-cause hospitalizations (approximately one inpatient hospitalization every 5 years), 1.07 hospital days, and $17,478 in expenditures. The presence of clinically significant TR, alone or with HF, significantly increased healthcare utilization and expenditures. For patients with no HF with clinically significant TR, the annualized economic burden increased to 0.41 all-cause hospitalizations, 3.13 hospital days, and $29,985 in expenditures. For patients with HF and clinically significant TR, the annualized economic burden was even greater with 0.59 all-cause hospitalizations, 4.31 hospital days, and $42,255 in expenditures.Conclusion: The presence of clinically significant TR is associated with an increase in healthcare utilization and expenditures, irrespective of the presence of HF.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

