Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Classification of Signals01:30

Classification of Signals

1.3K
In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
1.3K
Sampling Continuous Time Signal01:11

Sampling Continuous Time Signal

616
In signal processing, a continuous-time signal can be sampled using an impulse-train sampling technique, followed by the zero-order hold method. Impulse-train sampling involves the use of a periodic impulse train, which consists of a series of delta functions spaced at regular intervals determined by the sampling period. When a continuous-time signal is multiplied by this impulse train, it generates impulses with amplitudes corresponding to the signal's values at the sampling points.
In the...
616
Upsampling01:22

Upsampling

545
Managing signal sampling rates is essential in digital signal processing to maintain signal integrity. A decimated signal, characterized by a reduced frequency range due to its lower sampling rate, can be upsampled by inserting zeros between each sample. This upsampling process expands the original spectrum and introduces repeated spectral replicas at intervals dictated by the new Nyquist frequency. To refine this zero-inserted sequence, it is passed through a lowpass filter with a cutoff...
545
Reconstruction of Signal using Interpolation01:10

Reconstruction of Signal using Interpolation

640
Signal processing techniques are essential for accurately converting continuous signals to digital formats and vice versa. When a continuous signal is sampled with a period T, the resulting sampled signal exhibits replicas of the original spectrum in the frequency domain, spaced at intervals equal to the sampling frequency. To handle this sampled signal, a zero-order hold method can be applied, which creates a piecewise constant signal by retaining each sample's value until the next...
640
Aliasing01:18

Aliasing

491
Accurate signal sampling and reconstruction are crucial in various signal-processing applications. A time-domain signal's spectrum can be revealed using its Fourier transform. When this signal is sampled at a specific frequency, it results in multiple scaled replicas of the original spectrum in the frequency domain. The spacing of these replicas is determined by the sampling frequency.
If the sampling frequency is below the Nyquist rate, these replicas overlap, preventing the original...
491
Sampling Theorem01:15

Sampling Theorem

1.2K
In signal processing, the analysis of continuous-time signals, denoted as x(t), often involves sampling techniques to convert these signals into discrete-time signals. This process is essential for digital representation and manipulation. A critical component in sampling is the train of impulses, characterized by the sampling interval and the sampling frequency. The relationship between these parameters and the original signal's properties dictates the success of the sampling process.
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fetal programming by the parental microbiome of offspring behavior, and DNA methylation and gene expression within the hippocampus.

Microbiome·2025
Same author

Generation and characterization of a humanized <i>ACE2</i> rat model for the study of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19.

Frontiers in microbiology·2025
Same author

Unrevealing the role of hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing hormone neurons in blood pressure regulation in hypertension.

Cardiovascular research·2025
Same author

Trends in gender representation of women as authors and participants over five decades of the journal of biomechanics.

Journal of biomechanics·2025
Same author

A Cxcl15 Cre Recombinase Mouse Model Useful to Study Gland Development in the Uterus.

Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000)·2025
Same author

Comparing Shod Ankle Kinematics from Optical Motion Capture and Biplane Fluoroscopy.

Footwear science·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles
11:54

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles

Published on: March 13, 2017

9.7K

Automatic segment filtering procedure for processing non-stationary signals.

Daniel J Davis1, John H Challis1

  • 1Biomechanics Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA.

Journal of Biomechanics
|January 19, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Automatic Segment Filtering Procedure (ASFP) improves biomechanical data analysis by adaptively filtering signals. This method enhances derivative accuracy for non-stationary signals, outperforming traditional fixed-frequency filtering.

Keywords:
FilteringInverse dynamicsNon-stationary signalsSignal processing

More Related Videos

Automated Analysis of Dynamic Ca2+ Signals in Image Sequences
06:49

Automated Analysis of Dynamic Ca2+ Signals in Image Sequences

Published on: June 16, 2014

17.6K
AMEBaS: Automatic Midline Extraction and Background Subtraction of Ratiometric Fluorescence Time-Lapses of Polarized Single Cells
06:03

AMEBaS: Automatic Midline Extraction and Background Subtraction of Ratiometric Fluorescence Time-Lapses of Polarized Single Cells

Published on: June 23, 2023

765

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles
11:54

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles

Published on: March 13, 2017

9.7K
Automated Analysis of Dynamic Ca2+ Signals in Image Sequences
06:49

Automated Analysis of Dynamic Ca2+ Signals in Image Sequences

Published on: June 16, 2014

17.6K
AMEBaS: Automatic Midline Extraction and Background Subtraction of Ratiometric Fluorescence Time-Lapses of Polarized Single Cells
06:03

AMEBaS: Automatic Midline Extraction and Background Subtraction of Ratiometric Fluorescence Time-Lapses of Polarized Single Cells

Published on: June 23, 2023

765

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Signal Processing
  • Data Analysis

Background:

  • Computing time derivatives is crucial in biomechanical data processing.
  • Signal noise amplification during differentiation reduces accuracy.
  • Traditional low-pass Butterworth filters use a single cut-off frequency, which is suboptimal for non-stationary signals with varying frequency components.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel method, the Automatic Segment Filtering Procedure (ASFP), for processing biomechanical signals.
  • To address the limitations of fixed cut-off frequencies in low-pass filters for non-stationary signals.
  • To improve the accuracy of signal derivatives in biomechanical analysis.

Main Methods:

  • The Automatic Segment Filtering Procedure (ASFP) was developed, utilizing different Butterworth filter cut-off frequencies for distinct signal segments.
  • Signal segments with varying energy content were identified using the Teager-Kaiser Energy Operator.
  • The Autocorrelation-Based Procedure (ABP) was employed to determine segment-specific filter cut-off frequencies.

Main Results:

  • The ASFP achieved a root mean square error (RMSE) of 16.4 rad s⁻² (26.6%) in estimating acceleration from the Dowling (1985) dataset.
  • A standard approach using a single ABP-determined cut-off frequency resulted in a higher RMSE of 25.5 rad s⁻² (41.4%).
  • A Generalized Cross-Validated Quintic Spline filter yielded an RMSE of 23.6 rad s⁻² (38.4%), also less accurate than ASFP.

Conclusions:

  • The ASFP offers a significant improvement in estimating acceleration from biomechanical data compared to conventional methods.
  • This adaptive filtering approach effectively preserves high-frequency content in non-stationary signals.
  • The ASFP is advantageous for accurate biomechanical data processing, particularly for signals with time-varying characteristics.