Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
Published on: July 5, 2015
Avoid Cohen's 'Small', 'Medium', and 'Large' for Power Analysis
Joshua Correll1, Christopher Mellinger1, Gary H McClelland1
1Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
Abstract:
One of the most difficult and important decisions in power analysis involves specifying an effect size. Researchers frequently employ definitions of small, medium, and large that were proposed by Jacob Cohen. These definitions are problematic for two reasons. First, they are arbitrary, based on non-scientific criteria. Second, they are inconsistent, changing dramatically and illogically as a function of the statistical test a researcher plans to use (e.g., t-test versus regression). These problems may be unknown to many researchers, but they have a huge impact on power analyses. Estimates of the required n may be inappropriately doubled or cut in half. For power analyses to have any meaning, these definitions of effect size should be avoided.
More Related Videos
07:02A Computerized Test Battery to Study Pharmacodynamic Effects on the Central Nervous System of Cholinergic Drugs in Early Phase Drug Development
Published on: February 11, 2019
11:01Automated Quantification and Analysis of Cell Counting Procedures Using ImageJ Plugins
Published on: November 17, 2016