Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 30, 2025

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: January 11, 2020
[Application of Logistic regression and decision tree analysis in prediction of acute myocardial infarction events]
Sheng Zhang1, Zhenjie Hu2, Lu Ye3
1Department of Neurology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou 310014, China.
Insights
Decision tree models show comparable predictive value to logistic regression for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) events. These data mining methods are effective for AMI prevention and control.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Informatics
- Data Science
Background:
- Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) poses a significant health challenge.
- Accurate prediction of AMI events is crucial for timely intervention and improved patient outcomes.
- Traditional statistical methods and emerging data mining techniques are being explored for predictive modeling.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the application and predictive performance of decision tree methods compared to logistic regression for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) prediction.
- To identify key clinical factors influencing AMI events using these modeling approaches.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of clinical data from 295 patients undergoing coronary angiography.
- Development of predictive models for AMI using logistic regression and decision tree algorithms (independent and dependent models).
- Comparison of model performance using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and Area Under the Curve (AUC) values.
Main Results:
- Logistic regression identified history of coronary artery disease, multi-vessel coronary artery disease, statin use, and apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1) level as independent predictors of AMI.
- Decision tree models identified multi-vessel coronary artery disease, history of coronary artery disease, and ApoA1 level as key factors.
- The logistic regression model achieved an AUC of 0.826, while decision tree models achieved AUCs of 0.765 and 0.726. The logistic regression model's AUC was significantly higher than the dependent decision tree model but comparable to the independent decision tree model.
Conclusions:
- The logistic regression-independent decision tree model demonstrated comparable predictive value to the logistic regression model for AMI events.
- Data mining techniques, such as decision trees, are feasible and effective tools for AMI prevention and control.
- These findings support the integration of data mining in clinical practice for predicting and managing cardiovascular events.
Objective:
To evaluate the application of decision tree method and Logistic regression in the prediction of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) events.
Methods:
The clinical data of 295 patients, who underwent coronary angiography due to angina or chest pain with unidentified causes in Zhejiang provincial People's Hospital during October 2018 and April 2019, were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty five patients were identified as AMI. Logistic regression and decision tree methods were performed to establish predictive models for the occurrence of AMI, respectively; and the models created by decision tree analysis were divided into Logistic regression-independent model (Tree 1) and Logistic regression-dependent model (Tree 2). The performance of Logistic regression and decision tree models were compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Results:
Logistic regression analysis showed that history of coronary artery disease, multi-vessel coronary artery disease, statin use and apolipoprotein (ApoA1) level were independent influencing factors of AMI events (all P<0.05). Logistic regression-independent decision tree model (Tree 1) showed that multi-vessel coronary artery disease was the root node, and history of coronary artery disease, ApoA1 level (the cutoff value:1.314 g/L) and anti-platelet drug use were descendant nodes. In Logistic regression-dependent decision tree model (Tree 2), multi-vessel coronary artery disease was still the root node, but only followed by two descendant nodes including history of coronary artery disease and ApoA1 level. The area under the curve (AUC) of ROC of Logistic regression model was 0.826, and AUCs of decision tree models were 0.765 and 0.726, respectively. AUC of Logistic regression model was significantly higher than that of Tree 2 (95% CI=0.041-0.145, Z=3.534, P<0.001), but was not higher than that of Tree 1 (95% CI=-0.014-0.121, Z=-1.173, P>0.05).
Conclusions:
The predictive value for AMI event was comparable between Logistic regression-independent decision tree model and Logistic regression model, implying the data mining methods are feasible and effective in AMI prevention and control.
More Related Videos
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
06:22Machine Learning-Based Cough Tone Classification: Diagnostic Exploration of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Respiratory Tract Infections
Published on: September 19, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Steps in Outbreak Investigation