Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Social media, self-harm and suicide.

Allan House1

  • 1Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, UK.

Bjpsych Bulletin
|January 21, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Social media use by individuals with mental health issues presents both benefits and risks, necessitating careful regulation. Professional bodies must actively shape public discourse on social media content moderation.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Decision-making and physician-assisted suicide: capacity assessment in the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill is inadequate.

BMJ supportive & palliative care·2025
Same author

New guidance for self-harm: an opportunity not to be missed: commentary, House.

The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science·2024
Same author

Linkage of routinely collected NHS data to evaluate liaison mental health services: challenges and lessons learned.

Health and social care delivery research·2024
Same author

Experiences of delivering and receiving mental healthcare in the acute hospital setting: a qualitative study.

BMC health services research·2024
Same author

Serenity Integrated Mentoring and the High Intensity Network: a scheme that raises serious questions for practice and governance in UK psychiatry.

BJPsych bulletin·2022
Same author

Life events and functional neurological disorders.

Psychological medicine·2022

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatry
  • Digital Health
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • Social media use is prevalent among individuals with mental health conditions.
  • This usage presents unique challenges and opportunities regarding content exposure and interaction.
  • The debate on regulating social media for this population is often narrowly focused on content suppression.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the complex dilemma surrounding social media regulation for individuals with mental health problems, particularly those at risk of self-harm.
  • To advocate for a broader and more informed public debate on this issue.
  • To emphasize the crucial role of professional bodies in shaping this discourse.

Main Methods:

  • The study is a commentary and position paper.
  • It analyzes the current public discourse on social media regulation in mental health.
  • It draws upon the expertise and ethical considerations of professional psychiatric bodies.

Main Results:

  • Current discussions predominantly focus on content suppression, neglecting potential benefits and nuanced regulatory approaches.
  • Public participation in the debate is limited, hindering a comprehensive understanding of the issues.
  • Professional bodies have not sufficiently engaged in shaping the debate.

Conclusions:

  • A balanced approach to social media regulation is needed, considering both risks and benefits for individuals with mental health conditions.
  • Broader public engagement and a more informed debate are essential.
  • Professional organizations, such as the Royal College of Psychiatrists, must take a more proactive role in guiding the discussion and policy development.
Keywords:
Self-harminformation technologiesservice userssocial mediasuicide

Related Experiment Videos