Related Experiment Video For Chemotherapy tolerance
Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Improving management of comorbidity in patients with colorectal cancer using comprehensive medical assessment: a
Virginia Signal1, Christopher Jackson2, Louise Signal3
1Department of Public Health, University of Otago, PO Box 7343, South, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand. virginia.signal@otago.ac.nz.
Background:
Screening for and active management of comorbidity soon after cancer diagnosis shows promise in altering cancer treatment and outcomes for comorbid patients. Prior to a large multi-centre study, piloting of the intervention (comprehensive medical assessment) was undertaken to investigate the feasibility of the comorbidity screening tools and proposed outcome measures, and the feasibility, acceptability and potential effect of the intervention.
Methods:
In this pilot intervention study, 72 patients of all ages (36 observation/36 intervention) with newly diagnosed or recently relapsed colorectal adenocarcinoma were enrolled and underwent comorbidity screening and risk stratification. Intervention patients meeting pre-specified comorbidity criteria were referred for intervention, a comprehensive medical assessment carried out by geriatricians. Each intervention was individually tailored but included assessment and management of comorbidity, polypharmacy, mental health particularly depression, functional status and psychosocial issues. Recruitment and referral to intervention were tracked, verbal and written feedback were gathered from staff, and semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 13 patients to assess screening tool and intervention feasibility and acceptability. Interviews were transcribed and analysed thematically. Patients were followed for 6-12 months after recruitment to assess feasibility of proposed outcome measures (chemotherapy uptake and completion rates, grade 3-5 treatment toxicity, attendance at hospital emergency clinic, and unplanned hospitalisations) and descriptive data on outcomes collated.
Results:
Of the 29 intervention patients eligible for the intervention, 21 received it with feedback indicating that the intervention was acceptable. Those in the intervention group were less likely to be on 3+ medications, to have been admitted to hospital in previous 12 months, or to have limitations in daily activities. Collection of data to measure proposed outcomes was feasible with 55% (6/11) of intervention patients completing chemotherapy as planned compared to none (of 14) of the control group. No differences were seen in other outcome measures. Overall the study was feasible with modification, but the intervention was difficult to integrate into clinical pathways.
Conclusions:
This study generated valuable results that will be used to guide modification of the study and its approaches prior to progressing to a larger-scale study.
Trial Registration:
Retrospective, 26 August 2019, ACTRN12619001192178.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Management
Smoking Cessation
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Irritable Bowel Syndrome III: Medical and Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Nursing Management
Assessment
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment:
