Search research articles

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Dopamine projections to the basolateral amygdala enable reward prediction.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Prior cocaine use disrupts identification of hidden states by single units and neural ensembles in orbitofrontal cortex.

eLife·2026

Same author

Author Correction: Dopamine projections to the basolateral amygdala drive the encoding of identity-specific reward memories.

Nature neuroscience·2026

Same author

Different Behavioral Measures of Conditioned Magazine Activity Can Tell Different Stories about Brain Function.

eNeuro·2026

Same author

Persistent representation of a prior schema in the orbitofrontal cortex facilitates learning of a conflicting schema.

Nature communications·2026

Same author

High estrogen states enhance reinforcement learning.

Nature neuroscience·2025

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Creating Dynamic Images of Short-lived Dopamine Fluctuations with lp-ntPET: Dopamine Movies of Cigarette Smoking

Creating Dynamic Images of Short-lived Dopamine Fluctuations with lp-ntPET: Dopamine Movies of Cigarette Smoking

Published on: August 6, 2013

Causal evidence supporting the proposal that dopamine transients function as temporal difference prediction errors.

Etienne J P Maes¹, Melissa J Sharpe², Alexandra A Usypchuk¹

¹Department of Psychology/Centre for Studies in Behavioural Neurobiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Nature Neuroscience

|January 22, 2020

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Dopamine transients evoked by reward cues act as prediction errors, not predictions themselves. Shunting dopamine activity during cue presentation blocked second-order conditioning, supporting this temporal difference error role.

More Related Videos

Modeling Fast-scan Cyclic Voltammetry Data from Electrically Stimulated Dopamine Neurotransmission Data Using QNsim1.0

Modeling Fast-scan Cyclic Voltammetry Data from Electrically Stimulated Dopamine Neurotransmission Data Using QNsim1.0

Published on: June 5, 2017

Presynaptic Dopamine Dynamics in Striatal Brain Slices with Fast-scan Cyclic Voltammetry

Presynaptic Dopamine Dynamics in Striatal Brain Slices with Fast-scan Cyclic Voltammetry

Published on: January 12, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Creating Dynamic Images of Short-lived Dopamine Fluctuations with lp-ntPET: Dopamine Movies of Cigarette Smoking

Creating Dynamic Images of Short-lived Dopamine Fluctuations with lp-ntPET: Dopamine Movies of Cigarette Smoking

Published on: August 6, 2013

Modeling Fast-scan Cyclic Voltammetry Data from Electrically Stimulated Dopamine Neurotransmission Data Using QNsim1.0

Modeling Fast-scan Cyclic Voltammetry Data from Electrically Stimulated Dopamine Neurotransmission Data Using QNsim1.0

Published on: June 5, 2017

Presynaptic Dopamine Dynamics in Striatal Brain Slices with Fast-scan Cyclic Voltammetry

Presynaptic Dopamine Dynamics in Striatal Brain Slices with Fast-scan Cyclic Voltammetry

Published on: January 12, 2012

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Behavioral Neuroscience
Computational Neuroscience

Background:

Dopamine transients are recognized as reward prediction errors.
The role of dopamine transients evoked by reward-predictive cues remains debated.
Temporal difference learning models propose these cue-evoked transients are also errors.

Purpose of the Study:

To test whether dopamine transients evoked by reward-predictive cues function as temporal difference prediction errors.
To differentiate between cue-evoked dopamine transients as predictions versus errors.

Main Methods:

Optogenetically inhibiting dopamine activity specifically at the onset of reward-predicting cues.
Assessing the impact of this inhibition on second-order conditioning and blocking paradigms in animal models.

Main Results:

Optogenetic shunting of dopamine activity during cue presentation prevented the acquisition of second-order conditioning.
The same manipulation did not affect blocking, a phenomenon dependent on prediction errors.

Conclusions:

Cue-evoked dopamine transients function as temporal difference prediction errors.
These findings support the temporal difference account of dopamine's role in learning and motivation.