Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 30, 2025

09:27
Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
Published on: October 13, 2018
10.6K
Overlapping Mechanisms in Implying and Inferring
1Linguistics and English Language, University of Edinburgh.
Cognitive Science
|January 22, 2020
Summary
Speakers and listeners align in their use of implicatures, revealing shared cognitive processes in communication. This study bridges the gap between understanding how people imply and how they infer meaning.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Linguistics
- Cognitive Science
Background:
- Previous research on Gricean implicature primarily focused on listener comprehension (inference).
- The production aspect (implication) of implicature remains less understood despite its link to comprehension.
- A comprehensive understanding requires investigating shared processes between speaker implication and listener inference.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate shared cognitive processes underlying implicature production and inference.
- To gain a more integral understanding of how speakers imply and listeners infer meaning.
- To explore the relationship between utterance production and comprehension in dialogue.
Main Methods:
- Two experiments utilized a dialogue game where participants and confederates engaged in communication.
- Global priming (predominantly implicit or explicit confederate utterances) and local priming (trial-to-trial utterance structure variation) were manipulated.
- Participants had the choice to use implicature (imply) or explicit expressions.
Main Results:
- Speaker and listener alignment in the use of implicatures was observed.
- Local priming results suggest shared implicature representations between speakers and listeners.
- Global priming results indicate the influence of audience design on implicature use.
Conclusions:
- The findings demonstrate a convergence of cognitive processes in implicature production and inference.
- Evidence supports the existence of shared representations influencing both how we imply and how we understand implications.
- A model of implicature production is proposed, explaining the observed alignment and audience design effects.
Related Concept Videos
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
351
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
351
Inductive Reasoning
64.4K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
64.4K
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
409
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
409
Nonconscious Mimicry
5.0K
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
5.0K
Reason and Intuition
7.3K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.3K
Cause and Effect
12.0K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
12.0K

