Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Uncertainty Principle04:08

The Uncertainty Principle

31.0K
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...
31.0K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.6K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.6K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

99.1K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
99.1K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

49.7K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
49.7K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.2K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.2K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Molecular epidemiological investigation of swine hepatitis e virus (sHEV) in Guangdong Province, China: prevalence, genotypic characteristics, and zoonotic risk.

BMC veterinary research·2026
Same author

Predicting CO<sub>2</sub> injection profiles in heterogeneous reservoirs using a physics-aware deep learning framework.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Selective grazing in the heterotrophic dinoflagellate Oxyrrhis marina: Effects of prey type, size, temperature, and nutrient limitation.

Journal of phycology·2026
Same author

Retraction Note: Time-of-day immunochemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial.

Nature medicine·2026
Same author

Treatment for intermediate and advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: does systemic therapy synergize the therapeutic efficacy of TACE?

Frontiers in immunology·2026
Same author

Microbial community and functional characteristics across the water-sediment continuum in typical rivers of the Yellow River Delta.

Environmental research·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source
12:19

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source

Published on: April 4, 2017

8.8K

Incompatibility probability of random quantum measurements.

Lin Zhang1,2, Hua Xiang3, Xianqing Li-Jost2

  • 1Institute of Mathematics, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, People's Republic of China.

Physical Review. E
|January 23, 2020
PubMed
Summary

We determined the conditions for quantum measurement compatibility. For unbiased random qubit measurements, the incompatibility probability is precisely 3/5, revealing key quantum mechanics insights.

More Related Videos

A Photonic System for Generating Unconditional Polarization-Entangled Photons Based on Multiple Quantum Interference
07:56

A Photonic System for Generating Unconditional Polarization-Entangled Photons Based on Multiple Quantum Interference

Published on: September 5, 2019

8.9K
Measurement of Coherence Decay in GaMnAs Using Femtosecond Four-wave Mixing
15:58

Measurement of Coherence Decay in GaMnAs Using Femtosecond Four-wave Mixing

Published on: December 3, 2013

6.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source
12:19

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source

Published on: April 4, 2017

8.8K
A Photonic System for Generating Unconditional Polarization-Entangled Photons Based on Multiple Quantum Interference
07:56

A Photonic System for Generating Unconditional Polarization-Entangled Photons Based on Multiple Quantum Interference

Published on: September 5, 2019

8.9K
Measurement of Coherence Decay in GaMnAs Using Femtosecond Four-wave Mixing
15:58

Measurement of Coherence Decay in GaMnAs Using Femtosecond Four-wave Mixing

Published on: December 3, 2013

6.0K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum mechanics
  • Quantum information theory
  • Foundations of physics

Background:

  • Quantum measurement incompatibility is crucial for understanding nonclassical phenomena.
  • It is linked to Bell nonlocality, quantum uncertainty, and quantum steering.
  • Defining compatibility conditions for quantum measurements is an active research area.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish necessary and sufficient conditions for the compatibility of n quantum measurements in d-dimensional space.
  • To calculate the incompatibility probability for pairs of independent random measurements.
  • To analyze the incompatibility of general qubit measurements.

Main Methods:

  • Derivation of the compatibility criterion for two-qubit measurements.
  • Computation of incompatibility probability for random measurement pairs.
  • Analysis of general qubit measurement scenarios.

Main Results:

  • Established the necessary and sufficient conditions for quantum measurement compatibility.
  • Calculated the incompatibility probability for a pair of independent random measurements.
  • Derived that the incompatibility probability for unbiased random qubit measurements is exactly 3/5.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides a precise quantitative measure for quantum measurement incompatibility.
  • The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of nonclassical correlations in quantum systems.
  • Results offer a benchmark for analyzing quantum information processing protocols.